Skip to main content

Security report for blogspot.de

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Google LLC is a global leader in internet-related services and products, primarily known for its search engine, advertising technologies, cloud computing, and software offerings. As a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., Google maintains a dominant market position with a broad portfolio of services including Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube, and Android. The company targets a general audience worldwide, leveraging an advertising-driven business model supported by extensive technological infrastructure. Technically, Google's website demonstrates a mature and advanced digital infrastructure, utilizing proprietary frameworks, optimized performance, and comprehensive mobile responsiveness. The site employs modern web standards, strong SEO practices, and accessibility features, ensuring a high-quality user experience across platforms. From a security perspective, Google enforces HTTPS, implements robust security headers, and follows best practices to protect user data and privacy. The presence of detailed privacy and cookie policies, along with GDPR compliance, reflects a strong commitment to regulatory adherence. No significant vulnerabilities or security concerns were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, Google presents a highly trustworthy and professional online presence with excellent content quality, technical implementation, and security posture. The domain's long-standing registration and brand recognition further reinforce its legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include maintaining continuous security monitoring, enhancing transparency in contact information, and ongoing compliance updates to adapt to evolving privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blogspot.de

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention blogspot.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
45
Employees
0
Customers
45
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
36%

15 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for blogspot.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google's market positioning as the leading search engine and advertising platform provides significant competitive advantages, including vast user reach and data-driven advertising capabilities. The business model centers on monetizing search and related services through advertising revenue, supported by a diversified product ecosystem. Revenue streams include ads, cloud services, hardware sales, and subscription offerings. Target customers range from individual users to enterprises and advertisers globally. Growth indicators include continuous innovation, acquisitions, and expansion into emerging technologies such as AI and autonomous vehicles. The partnership ecosystem includes subsidiaries and strategic alliances enhancing Google's service portfolio and market penetration.

Security posture

Google exhibits a high level of security maturity, with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and adherence to privacy regulations such as GDPR. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses secure forms and inputs. While no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages were found, Google's global reputation and infrastructure imply robust incident management capabilities. Compliance gaps are minimal, and data protection practices are well documented. The security culture is reflected in transparent policies and continuous updates to security measures. No critical vulnerabilities or compliance issues were identified in the current analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain continuous vulnerability scanning and penetration testing to identify emerging threats.
  2. Enhance visibility of security and incident response contact channels to improve transparency.
  3. Regularly update privacy and cookie policies to reflect changes in regulations and technologies.
  4. Promote security awareness and trust signals prominently on the website to reinforce user confidence.
  5. Develop a public vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google LLC operates a global search engine and provides a wide range of internet-related services and products including advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware.
Key services
Search engine, Advertising, Cloud services, Email, Maps, Video sharing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Fonts, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Proprietary Google frameworks
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • No exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Google Marketing Platform
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and functional
  2. Content is professional and well structured
  3. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges
  7. High brand trust and market position
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is built on modern web technologies including advanced JavaScript frameworks and Google proprietary libraries. Hosting is provided by Google Cloud Platform, ensuring high availability and scalability. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and mobile-first design. The site demonstrates strong SEO and accessibility compliance, contributing to excellent user experience. Technical risks are minimal due to continuous maintenance and updates. Opportunities for modernization include expanding progressive web app features and enhancing real-time analytics capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blogspot.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blogspot.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.