Skip to main content

Security report for blog2social.com

Blog2Social · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blog2Social is a technology company specializing in social media automation tools designed specifically for WordPress users. Their platform offers features such as autoposting, cross-posting, and scheduling across more than 20 social networks, targeting marketers and social media managers who seek to streamline their content distribution. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on its niche market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Bootstrap framework, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure. However, some technical aspects such as security headers and privacy policies are lacking or not visible in the provided content, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected but missing some best practices. Overall, the site is accessible and functional with good content quality but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blog2social.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Blog2Social operates in the technology sector with a focus on social media automation for WordPress platforms. Their business model is SaaS-oriented, providing tools that integrate directly with WordPress to facilitate social media marketing efforts. The company appears to have a medium-sized operation with a clear target audience of WordPress users and social media professionals. The presence of a Facebook page indicates active social media engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS data for the subdomain is typical and does not raise immediate concerns. However, the absence of visible contact information and privacy policies may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries in the provided data. The company’s market position is that of a specialized tool provider within the WordPress ecosystem.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided HTML content, which suggests room for improvement in security best practices. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or incident response information, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No forms or data collection points were identified in the snippet, reducing immediate risk of data leakage. The WHOIS data is unavailable for the subdomain, which is expected, but no suspicious patterns were found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly audit and update the technical stack and website content to maintain performance, accessibility, and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blog2Social
Description
Social media automation for WordPress with Blog2Social: autoposting, cross-posting, scheduling, and more on 20+ social networks.
Key services
autoposting, cross-posting, scheduling, social media management on 20+ networks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4, Poppins font, Inter font, Astra theme
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No WHOIS data for subdomain as expected
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet
  5. Social media presence indicated via Facebook link
  6. No security headers or policies explicitly visible in HTML
  7. No forms detected in provided HTML snippet
  8. Website uses WordPress with Astra theme and Bootstrap framework
  9. Content is business-focused on social media automation for WordPress
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Astra theme and Bootstrap 4 framework, with fonts Poppins and Inter loaded locally. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance appears moderate based on the technology stack and content size. No explicit hosting provider information was found. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. The site lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are technical gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the business purpose but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blog2social.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blog2social.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.