Skip to main content

Security report for blockvis.com

Blockvis, SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blockvis, SIA is a Latvia-based technology company specializing in the development of intelligent AI agents and blockchain-based solutions. Founded in 2017, the company leverages deep blockchain expertise to deliver secure, transparent, and high-performing AI-driven products and services. Their market position is that of a niche technology provider focused on AI agent development, prompt engineering, LLM integration, autonomous workflows, and blockchain security consulting. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear service offerings targeting businesses and developers in the AI and blockchain sectors. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, and optimized for fast performance and mobile responsiveness. The site demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices but lacks some advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could enhance its security posture. No forms or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user data collection. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain registration protections in place, but it lacks published privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing a consistent and legitimate domain registration. Overall, Blockvis presents a credible and professional technology service business with a solid technical foundation but should address privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blockvis.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Blockvis operates in the technology sector with a focus on AI and blockchain integration. Their competitive advantage lies in combining blockchain security expertise with advanced AI agent development and prompt engineering. The business model is service-oriented, targeting enterprises and developers needing custom AI and blockchain solutions, including smart contract development and DeFi auditing. The company is a member of the Latvian Blockchain Association, indicating active community engagement and industry collaboration. Growth indicators include a well-structured website and a clear service portfolio, though no direct revenue or partnership data is disclosed. The company appears to be small-sized but specialized, with a strong local presence in Latvia and a focus on emerging technologies.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Blockvis is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and has domain-level protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, and no vulnerable libraries were detected. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and related regulations. The company should improve transparency around data protection and incident handling to strengthen security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain a secure technology stack.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Blockvis, SIA
Registration number
LV40203070356
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blockvis, SIA
Description
Blockvis leverages deep blockchain expertise to build secure, transparent, and high-performing AI agents and prompt-driven solutions.
Key services
AI Agent Development, Prompt Engineering, LLM Integration, Autonomous Systems, Crypto-Aware AI, Blockchain Foundation, Smart Contract Development, DeFi Protocol Design and Auditing, Web3 Application Architecture, Blockchain Security Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company registration details
  4. Technical implementation uses modern frameworks and good performance
  5. Security practices are basic but could be improved with additional headers and DNSSEC
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No forms present on the site for data collection
  8. External links limited and relevant to business context
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, which offers performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blockvis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blockvis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.