Skip to main content

Security report for blockmarktech.com

BlockMark Technologies Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BlockMark Technologies Ltd operates a specialized certificate management platform called BlockMark Registry, targeting organizations and individuals involved in certification processes. The company leverages cloud and blockchain technologies to provide secure, efficient, and user-friendly digital certificate issuance, management, and verification services. With a growing user base and extensive certificate records, BlockMark positions itself as a trusted player in the digital credential space. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and security plugins, including Yoast SEO and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and integrates analytics for performance monitoring. However, some security headers are missing, and cookie consent mechanisms are not explicitly implemented, which could be improved for better compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot protections in place, but the absence of published security policies and incident response information limits transparency. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but is mitigated by clear company registration details and active social media presence. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a professional and credible presence with room for enhancement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blockmarktech.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BlockMark Technologies operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital credential management. Their platform serves multiple user roles: issuers, recipients, and inspectors, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for certificate lifecycle management. The business model is platform-based, generating value through SaaS offerings and possibly subscription or usage fees. Market positioning is strong with a significant number of users and certificates, indicating adoption and trust. The company maintains active engagement through social media and provides extensive support resources. Growth potential is supported by continuous feature development and blockchain integration, appealing to sectors requiring verified credentials. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified, suggesting an independent operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies suggest gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting external reporting channels. The WHOIS data absence raises minor concerns but is not uncommon for tech startups. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but would benefit from enhanced transparency, formal policies, and improved header configurations to mitigate risks and demonstrate compliance with standards like GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy compliance.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BlockMark Technologies LTD
Registration number
10821944
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BlockMark Technologies Ltd
Description
BlockMark Technologies Ltd is the company behind the certificate management platform BlockMark Registry. They provide a platform for issuing, receiving, inspecting, and managing digital certificates leveraging cloud and blockchain technology to enhance cybersecurity, trust, and convenience. The platform supports issuers, recipients, and inspectors with features like smart badges, data analytics, and certificate lifecycle management.
Key services
Certificate issuance and management, Certificate inspection and verification, Smart badges and printable certificates, Data analytics and monitoring, Profile pages for individuals and organisations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Popup Maker plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or recent registration
  5. Strong business presence with clear contact info and company registration details
  6. Active social media and external links to trusted platforms
  7. Uses standard WordPress plugins and Google Analytics for tracking
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. It uses jQuery and Popup Maker plugins for interactive elements. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking. Opportunities exist to enhance security posture and privacy compliance through technical improvements and policy publication.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100 −12Medium36 findingsView report
  2. 62/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blockmarktech.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blockmarktech.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.