Skip to main content

Security report for bling.com.br

Bling - Sistema de gestão online · Technology · Brazil

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bling is a prominent Brazilian SaaS ERP platform offering comprehensive business management solutions including sales, inventory, logistics, finance, and automation. It serves a large user base of over 300,000 daily users, targeting entrepreneurs, SMEs, e-commerce, physical stores, service providers, and small industries. The platform integrates with over 250 marketplaces and sales channels, providing automated invoicing and financial management with a digital account. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern optimization plugins like WP Rocket and uses various JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. Security posture is solid with a valid SSL certificate and HSTS enabled, but lacks modern TLS protocol support and DNS security enhancements. Privacy and terms policies are present but cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates good digital maturity and strong market positioning in Brazil's ERP sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bling.com.br

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bling holds a strong market position in Brazil's ERP and e-commerce management space, leveraging a SaaS model with extensive integrations and automation capabilities. Its competitive advantage lies in its multichannel sales hub, financial automation including a proprietary digital account, and a rich ecosystem of partners and extensions. The company targets diverse customer segments from online sellers to physical retailers and service providers, emphasizing ease of use and comprehensive management. The presence of educational resources, partner programs, and a large user community indicates a mature growth strategy and ecosystem development. The business model is subscription-based with tiered pricing starting at R$55, supported by a robust digital presence and marketing efforts.

Security posture

The security posture of Bling's website is generally good with a valid SSL certificate issued by a trusted authority and HSTS enabled to enforce HTTPS. However, the site does not support modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3), which is a significant security gap. DNSSEC and CAA records are not implemented, reducing DNS and certificate issuance security. No explicit security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The use of hCaptcha for form protection and absence of known SSL vulnerabilities are positive indicators. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site is secure but could improve in protocol support and security governance transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to enhance encryption security.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to improve DNS and certificate security.
  3. Add a security.txt file and publicly disclose vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures.
  4. Introduce explicit cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy policies to ensure GDPR and other compliance frameworks are met.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
LWSA – Filial Bling
Registration number
02.351.877/0011-24
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS version 6.8.1, utilizing popular plugins such as WP Rocket for performance optimization, Contact Form 7 for forms, and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The tech stack includes jQuery, Swiper.js, Select2, and Fancybox for UI components. Hosting is inferred to be via Cloudflare due to DNS and SSL configurations. Performance metrics indicate moderate load times (~7.7 seconds) with a page size of ~58KB and 138 resources loaded. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and preloading of fonts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include outdated TLS protocol support and lack of DNS security features, which could impact business continuity and data protection if exploited.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bling.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bling.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.