Skip to main content

Security report for bksystems.de

bk systems GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

bk systems GmbH is a medium-sized IT system house based in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, specializing in digital transformation, IT infrastructure, managed services, data protection, and print solutions. The company targets SMEs and Mittelstand businesses primarily in northern Germany and is part of the GBC Group. Their website reflects a professional and regionally focused business with a strong emphasis on GDPR compliance and customer-centric IT services. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools with a compliant cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though formal security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the website is well-designed, trustworthy, and provides clear business information, supporting a good market position in their sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bksystems.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bksystems.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
20%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bksystems.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector providing IT services and digitalization solutions to regional SMEs. Their business model combines consultancy, managed services, and hardware/software provisioning. They maintain partnerships with recognized technology vendors such as Microsoft, Sophos, and Datto, enhancing their service portfolio and credibility. The company shows growth and stability indicators, including a 40-year history and integration into a larger corporate group (GBC Group). Their marketing approach leverages digital channels and tracking tools, indicating a mature digital presence. The absence of a public terms of service or security policy page suggests areas for improvement in formalizing compliance and customer assurance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent consistent with GDPR requirements. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided data, and no incident response or abuse contact information is published, which are gaps in security transparency. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking but is managed via consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies, incident response contacts, and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and frameworks.
  2. Provide clear incident response and abuse contact information on the website.
  3. Add and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize security risks and improve privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
bk systems GmbH
Description
IT system house in Schleswig-Holstein offering digitalization, IT services, managed services, data protection, cloud, security, hardware/software, print solutions, and process/workflow digitalization.
Key services
IT Dienstleistungen, Digitales Arbeiten, Datenschutzbeauftragter extern, Managed Services, Printlösungen, Digitale Infrastruktur, Prozesse und Workflows
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, SalesViewer, Pipedrive tracking
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), SalesViewer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
SalesViewer, Pipedrive
Marketing tools
SalesViewer, Pipedrive
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German targeting regional SMEs.
  3. Strong emphasis on GDPR compliance and external data protection officer services.
  4. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing tools with cookie consent.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  6. Good technical implementation using TYPO3 CMS and modern scripts.
  7. Multiple reputable partner logos displayed enhancing trust.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and extensible content management system, supported by jQuery and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced interactivity. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and integrates marketing tools like SalesViewer and Pipedrive. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with compressed CSS and JS assets. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS and WHOIS data indicate a German hosting environment consistent with the business location. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for modernization in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bksystems.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bksystems.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.