Skip to main content

Security report for bkralik.cz

Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bkralik.cz is a personal portfolio and informational site belonging to an individual who identifies as a student, programmer, and photographer based in the Czech Republic. The site serves primarily as a hub for various subdomains and personal projects rather than a commercial business. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on simple HTML and CSS with hosting provided by Active24. There is no evidence of modern CMS or advanced web technologies, and the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting visitor data and ensuring trust. From a security perspective, the site shows minimal maturity. There are no visible security policies, privacy or cookie notices, or incident response contacts. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes the site to potential risks, although the content itself is low risk and non-commercial. The WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a long-standing domain registration, which supports legitimacy but does not compensate for the lack of security best practices. Overall, the site is safe in terms of content but falls short in technical and security implementations. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, which could be a concern if the site collects any user data in the future. Strategic improvements should focus on implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bkralik.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bkralik.cz operates as a personal website for an individual engaged in programming, photography, and network management. It does not appear to have a commercial business model or revenue streams. The target audience is likely personal contacts, peers, and hobbyists interested in the individual's projects. The site references multiple subdomains indicating a broader personal project ecosystem. There are no partnerships or business affiliations evident beyond social media links. The site’s market presence is minimal and focused on personal branding rather than competitive positioning.

Security posture

The security posture of bkralik.cz is basic and lacks several critical elements. The absence of HTTPS is a major vulnerability, exposing users to potential interception of data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, increasing risk of common web attacks. There are no visible forms or input fields, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating non-compliance with GDPR. Incident response mechanisms and security contact points are not provided, which could delay response to any security incidents. Overall, the site requires significant improvements to meet modern security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience across devices.
  5. Introduce a secure contact form with input validation and spam protection to facilitate communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of a student, programmer, and photographer who manages a small network segment and studies at Charles University in Prague. The site serves mainly as a mask hiding multiple subpages.
Key services
Photography, Programming, Network management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio and informational site with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No forms or interactive elements present.
  4. No modern web technologies or analytics detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible from provided data.
  6. Contact information is minimal and obfuscated for spam protection.
  7. Site uses Czech language and targets a Czech audience.
  8. Site content is safe and non-adult.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is aged appropriately.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without any detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. Hosting is provided by Active24, a known Czech hosting provider. The site uses a legacy character encoding (windows-1250) which is uncommon in modern web development and may affect compatibility. There is no evidence of performance optimization or mobile-friendly design. SEO is minimal with only basic meta tags present. The site lacks modern technical features such as responsive design, structured data, or analytics integration. Technical debt is evident in outdated encoding and lack of security features, presenting opportunities for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bkralik.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bkralik.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.