Skip to main content

Security report for bitrix24.team

Битрикс24 · Technology · Russia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bitrix24.team is a login portal for the Bitrix24 collaboration and CRM platform, primarily targeting Russian-speaking business users. The platform offers tools to help businesses work more efficiently through communication, CRM, and business process automation. The website is built on the Bitrix CMS and framework, utilizing modern web technologies such as JavaScript, WebGL, and WebSockets to provide interactive and real-time features including QR code login. The site is mobile-optimized and supports multiple languages, enhancing accessibility for a diverse user base. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and provides secure login mechanisms including password and QR code authentication. However, the absence of security headers and public privacy or cookie policies indicates room for improvement in security best practices and compliance. No contact or incident response information is publicly available, which may impact user trust and support responsiveness. The WHOIS data is not publicly accessible due to TLD restrictions and privacy protections, but the domain appears consistent with the brand and business purpose. Overall, the website demonstrates a moderate level of technical maturity and business credibility but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures. Strategic enhancements in security headers, privacy policies, and public contact information would strengthen the platform's trustworthiness and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitrix24.team

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bitrix24 operates as a SaaS provider in the technology sector, focusing on collaboration and CRM solutions for businesses. It holds a strong market position in Russia and CIS countries, leveraging a well-known brand name. The business model centers on subscription-based access to a suite of productivity tools. The platform targets medium to large enterprises seeking integrated communication and business process management solutions. The absence of public contact details and privacy policies suggests a controlled user environment, likely relying on direct customer relationships and enterprise contracts. The multi-language support indicates an intent to serve a broader international audience. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure login forms, including advanced QR code authentication, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The absence of publicly available privacy, cookie, and incident response policies suggests gaps in compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is moderate, but improvements in transparency and technical controls are recommended to enhance resilience and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the website footer or login page.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve defense against web attacks.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to facilitate security communication.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and security contacts to improve user trust and compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Битрикс24
Description
Помогает бизнесу работать
Key services
collaboration tools, CRM, business process automation, communication platform
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bitrix Framework, JavaScript, WebGL, BX Runtime, REST API, WebSockets, Long Polling
Frameworks
Bitrix Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure login form with password and remember me option
  • QR code login option

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Bitrix24 collaboration platform
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with multi-language support
  3. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed
  5. Uses Bitrix CMS and framework technologies
  6. Secure login form with password and QR code authentication
  7. No visible security headers in HTML source
  8. No external analytics or advertising scripts detected
  9. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to TLD restrictions and privacy
  10. No adult or explicit content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS and framework, utilizing JavaScript extensively along with WebGL for GPU detection and enhanced UI effects. It supports real-time communication via WebSockets and long polling, indicating a modern and interactive infrastructure. The login form collects username and password securely and offers QR code login for convenience. The site is mobile-optimized and supports multiple languages, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate with preloaded images and bundled scripts. No external analytics or advertising scripts were detected, suggesting limited third-party tracking. The lack of security headers and privacy disclosures are notable technical gaps.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitrix24.team. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitrix24.team.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.