Skip to main content

Security report for bitrix24.com.br

Bitrix Inc · Technology · Brazil

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bitrix Inc operates Bitrix24, a comprehensive SaaS platform offering CRM, project management, collaboration, marketing, and HR automation tools. With a strong market presence serving over 15 million organizations globally and availability in 18 languages, Bitrix24 positions itself as an enterprise-grade solution for businesses of all sizes. The platform supports web, mobile, and desktop clients, leveraging a proprietary Bitrix framework and modern web technologies. Security posture is adequate with valid SSL certificates and no known vulnerabilities, but lacks modern TLS protocol support and advanced security headers. The website demonstrates good GDPR and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms and detailed policies. Extensive use of analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. Overall, Bitrix24's website reflects a professional, trustworthy, and technically competent business with room for security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitrix24.com.br

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bitrix24 targets a broad business audience including sales teams, project managers, marketers, HR departments, and customer support. Its SaaS model includes free and paid tiers, with an on-premise option for customization. The company leverages partnerships (e.g., bitrixsoft.com) and maintains a strong ecosystem with over 550 apps and integrations. The platform's competitive advantages include an all-in-one solution replacing multiple SaaS tools, fixed pricing, and extensive localization. The business model focuses on recurring revenue from subscriptions and enterprise deployments. Strategic marketing and social media presence support brand awareness and customer engagement. The company emphasizes AI-powered features like CoPilot to enhance productivity.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate; the site uses a valid SSL certificate from a reputable CA but does not enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3), which is a significant gap. No HSTS policy is enforced, and security headers are not present, reducing protection against common web attacks. DNSSEC and CAA records are not configured, which could improve domain security. The site includes abuse contact information and a security policy page, indicating some incident response readiness. GDPR compliance is evident through cookie consent and privacy policies. No explicit data protection officer contact or vulnerability disclosure policy (security.txt) was found, suggesting areas for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to improve encryption standards and compatibility.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Configure DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain name system security and control certificate issuance.
  5. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure guidelines and improve security transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS and framework, utilizing JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Bootstrap, Glide.js, and Owl Carousel for UI components. It integrates with multiple analytics and marketing platforms including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and TikTok Pixel. Hosting is via Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure. Performance metrics indicate a slow load time (~9.8 seconds) and a large page size (~1.8 MB), suggesting optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and localized content. The site uses advanced cookie management and GDPR compliance scripts. Technical risks include outdated TLS protocols and lack of security headers, which could impact user trust and data protection.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitrix24.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitrix24.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.