Skip to main content

Security report for bitninja.io

BitNinja Security · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BitNinja Security is a technology company specializing in AI-powered server security solutions for Linux servers. Their platform offers a centralized dashboard with features such as malware scanning, IP reputation management, web application firewall, and spam detection. The company targets IT professionals and hosting providers seeking robust server protection. The website is built on WordPress using Oxygen builder and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security and privacy policies are not found in the analyzed content. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy and longevity of the business. Strategic improvements include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security headers to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bitninja.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitninja.io

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BitNinja operates in the cybersecurity technology sector with a focus on server security for Linux environments. Their business model is B2B SaaS, providing security tools to enterprises and hosting providers. The company has been established since 2004, indicating market experience and stability. The website reflects a professional brand with consistent messaging and a clear value proposition centered on AI-enhanced security. Integration with multiple analytics and marketing platforms suggests active customer engagement and data-driven marketing strategies. No direct contact information or detailed corporate data was found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and customer trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a clientTransferProhibited domain status, indicating domain transfer protection. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, and no security headers were detected in the provided data. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for domain security. The use of modern analytics and marketing scripts is extensive, which increases tracking but is managed with consent. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy page detailing security frameworks and practices.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BitNinja Security
Description
A server security suite with centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered Linux malware scanner, robust IP reputation, WAF, Spam Detection.
Key services
AI-powered Linux malware scanner, IP reputation management, Web Application Firewall (WAF), Spam detection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Oxygen Builder, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Amplitude Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
OptiMonk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern analytics and marketing tools with proper cookie consent.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  4. Website is built on WordPress with Oxygen builder, indicating a professional CMS usage.
  5. Security practices are good but could be improved with explicit security policies and DNSSEC.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content or domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Oxygen builder, indicating a modern CMS and page builder usage. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and OptiMonk. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. No critical technical vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS configuration for enhanced resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium22 findingsView report
  2. 74/100 +2Medium22 findingsView report
  3. 72/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitninja.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitninja.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.