Skip to main content

Security report for bitninja.io

BitNinja Security · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BitNinja Security is a technology company specializing in AI-powered server security solutions primarily targeting Linux servers. Their offerings include an AI-driven malware scanner, IP reputation management, Web Application Firewall (WAF), and spam detection, delivered via a centralized dashboard. The company appears to have a solid market position as a provider of advanced server security tools, catering to IT professionals and hosting providers. The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with integrations for analytics and marketing, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and domain registration consistent with the business age, though some security best practices like DNSSEC and security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is partially met with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service documentation. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitninja.io

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BitNinja operates in the cybersecurity technology sector with a focus on server security for Linux environments. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering security tools that leverage AI to enhance malware detection and threat prevention. The company has been established since 2004, indicating longevity and experience. The website's use of advanced analytics and marketing tools suggests an active approach to customer engagement and growth. However, the absence of direct contact information and formal policy documents may limit transparency. The company likely targets hosting providers, system administrators, and enterprises requiring robust server protection. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, preventing unauthorized transfers. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program reduces transparency and preparedness visibility. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and implementing additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and transparency.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response information to build trust and readiness.
  5. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BitNinja Security
Description
A server security suite with centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered Linux malware scanner, robust IP reputation, WAF, Spam Detection.
Key services
AI-powered Linux malware scanner, IP reputation management, Web Application Firewall (WAF), Spam Detection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Google Tag Manager, Amplitude Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Cookiebot, OptiMonk, jQuery 3.7.1, Oxygen Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
OptiMonk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern analytics and marketing tools with cookie consent.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or metadata.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie disclosures.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content or metadata.
  5. Website is built on WordPress with Oxygen builder and uses Cloudflare DNS.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Website content is professional and focused on server security solutions.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Oxygen builder, indicating a modern CMS environment. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Cookiebot, and OptiMonk, reflecting a mature digital marketing and data collection strategy. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses standard web fonts and has structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium22 findingsView report
  2. 74/100 +2Medium22 findingsView report
  3. 72/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitninja.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitninja.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.