Skip to main content

Security report for bitninja.io

BitNinja Security · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BitNinja Security offers an AI-powered server security platform focused on Linux servers, providing malware scanning, IP reputation management, web application firewall, and spam detection. The company targets hosting providers, VPS providers, shared and dedicated server owners, and CMS users, positioning itself as an industry leader with a comprehensive and centralized security dashboard.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bitninja.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitninja.io

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BitNinja operates a SaaS business model delivering server security solutions primarily to technology sector clients such as hosting providers and VPS operators. The company leverages partnerships with recognized industry players and showcases certifications like AICPA SOC, GDPR, and CCPA compliance to build trust. Its revenue streams likely include subscription plans and upsell strategies tailored for VPS providers. The target audience is well-defined, and the company emphasizes ease of use, premium support, and AI-driven innovation. The presence of multiple branded domains and partner sites indicates a structured ecosystem supporting its offerings. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns, free trials, and a strong content strategy with blogs and success stories.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent tools to comply with privacy regulations. Security best practices include the use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts with integrity attributes. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not visibly configured, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and clearer incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance form security by visibly implementing anti-CSRF tokens and input validation.
  5. Maintain continuous monitoring and update of privacy compliance mechanisms to align with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BitNinja Security
Description
A server security suite with centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered Linux malware scanner, robust IP reputation, WAF, Spam Detection.
Key services
AI-powered Linux malware scanner, IP reputation management, Web Application Firewall (WAF), Outbound spam detection, Centralized security dashboard
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Oxygen Builder, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Amplitude Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Cookiebot, OptiMonk
Frameworks
WordPress, Oxygen Builder
Platforms
Linux server security focus
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with integrity and crossorigin attributes
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, RudderStack
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Amplitude, Hotjar, Microsoft UET, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
OptiMonk, Hubspot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging throughout site
  3. Multiple trusted partner logos and client testimonials present
  4. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with clear privacy disclosures
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges, full content accessible
  6. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found on site
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Oxygen Builder framework, integrating modern JavaScript libraries and analytics platforms such as Amplitude, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses CDN services and prefetching techniques to improve load times. Technical debt appears low with a clean and structured codebase. Opportunities exist to improve security header implementation and optimize some third-party script loading for enhanced performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium22 findingsView report
  2. 74/100Medium22 findingsView report
  3. 74/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitninja.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitninja.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.