Skip to main content

Security report for bitlab.host

BitLab d.o.o. · Technology · Bosnia and Herzegovina

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BitLab d.o.o. is a medium-sized IT company based in Bosnia and Herzegovina, specializing in a broad range of technology services including web development, mobile applications, 3D visualization, hosting, education, and e-commerce. Established in 2015, the company has completed over 500 projects and serves a diverse clientele including government agencies and educational institutions. Their business model focuses on providing comprehensive IT solutions and digital services tailored to client needs, supported by a strong local presence and multilingual website content. Technically, BitLab employs a modern technology stack with popular frameworks and platforms, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. However, some areas such as accessibility and SEO could be improved further. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies, which are recommended for enhanced trust and compliance. Overall, BitLab presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitlab.host

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BitLab holds a solid market position as a regional IT service provider with a diversified portfolio spanning hosting, web and mobile development, 3D visualization, and education. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive service offerings, local language support, and established client base including public sector entities. The company leverages multiple related domains and subdomains to segment services effectively. Revenue streams likely include service contracts, hosting packages, educational courses, and e-commerce sales. The target customers are businesses and organizations in need of IT solutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina and neighboring regions. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and active project pipeline. Partnerships with domains like ordera.app and ekonferencije.com suggest strategic collaborations enhancing their ecosystem. The company’s operations reflect a mature business with a focus on quality and client satisfaction.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or incident response policies indicates gaps in security best practices. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or a designated data protection officer. These gaps could impact compliance with GDPR and other regulations. The company should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security policies to improve their security posture and client trust. Incident response readiness appears limited due to lack of public contact channels for security issues. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, the security culture and transparency could be enhanced.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Develop and make publicly available a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy including dedicated security contact emails (e.g., security@bitlab.rs).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BitLab d.o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BitLab d.o.o.
Description
Pretvaramo ideje u stvarnost. Iza nas su godine iskustva, istraživanja i vrijednog rada i mnoštvo uspješno realizovanih projekata. Naš kreativni tim je razvio i razvija više korisnih i inovativnih projeakta.
Key services
Hosting, Web development, Mobile applications, 3D visualization, Webshop retail, Education and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, Laravel, CakePHP, Zend, CodeIgniter, ASP, C#, .NET, Python, Node.js, Java, C++, VB.NET, CSS3, HTML5, JavaScript, Angular, React, jQuery, Vue.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4, PhotoSphereViewer
Platforms
WordPress, WooCommerce, Magento
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by Google Analytics and external links)
  • Use of ticket support system
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
AddThis
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  4. Website uses modern technologies and frameworks with good mobile optimization.
  5. Security posture is moderate but lacks published policies and security headers.
  6. WHOIS data shows privacy protection but domain age and content are consistent with legitimate business.
  7. Multiple related domains and subdomains indicate a broad service ecosystem.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

BitLab’s technical infrastructure is built on a modern and diverse technology stack including PHP frameworks, .NET, Python, JavaScript frameworks, and database technologies. The website uses Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and integrates advanced features like 3D visualization with PhotoSphereViewer. Hosting appears to be managed internally or through related domains, with domain registration via Go Daddy and privacy protection enabled. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses multiple external libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and AddThis for marketing. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility, SEO, and security practices to reduce technical debt and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitlab.host. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitlab.host.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.