Skip to main content

Security report for bitbucket.org

Atlassian Pty Ltd · Technology · Australia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bitbucket, operated by Atlassian Pty Ltd, is a mature and enterprise-grade Git-based code hosting and CI/CD platform tightly integrated with Jira and the Atlassian ecosystem. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with modern web technologies, responsive design, and comprehensive content targeting software development teams and enterprises. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and domain protections, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not directly visible. Privacy compliance is supported by OneTrust cookie consent mechanisms, but privacy and terms links are not clearly found in the provided content. Overall, Bitbucket presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-branded online presence consistent with its market position as a leading DevOps platform.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bitbucket.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitbucket.org

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bitbucket.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
99,125
Employees
2
Customers
99,014
Third parties
109
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2025-04-15 · 16 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bitbucket.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –bitbucket.org2025-04-15
  • –bitbucket.org2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bitbucket serves a global audience of software developers and enterprises, offering integrated code collaboration, CI/CD pipelines, and security tooling. Its business model is SaaS-based, leveraging Atlassian's cloud platform. The company benefits from strong market positioning as a Gartner Magic Quadrant leader and extensive partner integrations. The website content highlights customer testimonials and migration assistance, indicating a focus on customer success and growth. The absence of direct contact info on the main page suggests reliance on Atlassian's broader corporate channels for support.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a reputable registrar and domain status protections, indicating a secure domain management approach. The presence of OneTrust for cookie consent shows privacy awareness. However, no explicit security headers or published security policies were detected in the content. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. The site would benefit from publishing clear security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures on the website.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  5. Include links to privacy policy and terms of service prominently on the main site.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atlassian Pty Ltd
Description
Bitbucket Cloud is a Git-based code and CI/CD tool optimized for teams using Jira.
Key services
Git repository hosting, CI/CD pipelines, Code review, Security and compliance tooling, Jira integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, YouTube iframe API, OneTrust cookie consent, AWS DNS hosting
Platforms
Atlassian Cloud Platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust
Marketing tools
OneTrust cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent Atlassian ecosystem integration
  3. Use of modern web technologies and compliance tools
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  5. No explicit privacy or terms of service links found in provided content
  6. Security policies and incident response info not explicitly found
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Magnolia CMS and leverages JavaScript libraries including jQuery and YouTube iframe API for multimedia content. Hosting is inferred to be on AWS based on DNS servers. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and performance is fast. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of OneTrust indicates compliance with cookie consent regulations. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust, supporting a high-quality user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100 −4Medium20 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitbucket.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitbucket.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.