Skip to main content

Security report for bitam.com

BITAM® · Technology · Mexico

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BITAM® is a well-established technology company founded in 2000, specializing in innovative data analytics, low code development, fiscal, retail, and CPG solutions. The company serves a broad business audience across Mexico, North America, Latin America, and Europe, positioning itself as a leader with over 24 years of experience. Their offerings include technology solutions integrated with ERP systems, online training courses, and a partner community, supported by a professional website with strong branding and client trust indicators. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot, and Google reCAPTCHA. Hosting is provided via SoftLayer and EasyDNS, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, although some improvements in accessibility and security headers could be made. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, includes anti-spam measures on forms, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, with a strong business credibility score. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response transparency to further strengthen security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitam.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BITAM® operates in the technology sector, focusing on data analytics, low code platforms, and business intelligence solutions tailored for fiscal, retail, and commercial sectors. Their market positioning as innovators with a long track record and a diverse client base including major companies enhances their competitive advantage. The business model combines product solutions, consulting, and educational services, targeting medium to large enterprises and consulting partners. The presence of a partner community (bPartner) and online courses indicates a growth strategy leveraging ecosystem development. The company maintains a strong brand presence with certifications and client testimonials, supporting sustained market relevance and trust.

Security posture

The security maturity of BITAM®'s website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and forms are protected with Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating a generally secure environment, but formalizing security governance and communication would enhance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BITAM®
Description
Innovamos por ti en investigación y desarrollo aplicando las nuevas tecnologías, soluciones con información inteligente.
Key services
Fiscal solutions, Data Analytics, Low Code development, Retail & CPG solutions, Online courses and training, Business partner community
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.0, Bootstrap 4.4.1 and 5.0.0, Font Awesome 5.15.3 and 6.4.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, HubSpot scripts, WOW.js for animations
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Spanish targeting business clients.
  2. Strong presence of client logos and certifications enhances trust.
  3. Use of multiple modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Contact form includes Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found except privacy notice.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and supports legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap (versions 4.4.1 and 5.0.0), jQuery 2.2.0, and Font Awesome for UI and icons, supported by Google Tag Manager and HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation. Hosting is via SoftLayer (IBM Cloud) and EasyDNS, indicating a robust infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security and includes animated UI elements via WOW.js. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Opportunities exist to modernize jQuery usage and consolidate Bootstrap versions to reduce technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitam.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitam.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.