Skip to main content

Security report for bit.lv

Baltijas Informācijas Tehnoloģijas SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltijas Informācijas Tehnoloģijas SIA (BIT) is a well-established Latvian IT company founded in 1992, specializing in IT infrastructure delivery, implementation, maintenance, and authorized servicing of HP, HPE, and Acer equipment. The company positions itself as a trusted IT partner for businesses in Latvia and the Baltic region, emphasizing quality, trust, and long-term experience. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear communication channels and a focus on certifications and compliance. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Hosting is managed via Microsoft Online services, indicating a reliable infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, ISO certifications, and an industrial security certificate, although some security headers could be improved and incident response contacts are not explicitly provided. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, BIT demonstrates a mature digital presence aligned with its business maturity and market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bit.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bit.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
38
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
29
Weak passwords
3%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bit.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BIT holds a strong market position as one of Latvia's oldest IT service providers with 32 years of experience. Their business model focuses on IT infrastructure solutions for corporate clients, including installation, maintenance, and authorized repair services. The company targets medium to large businesses seeking reliable IT partners. Their partnership ecosystem includes major global IT vendors such as HP, HPE, Microsoft, Citrix, and Fortinet, enhancing their service portfolio and credibility. The website content and certifications indicate a focus on quality and trust, which are key competitive advantages. Growth indicators include active news updates and a visible team structure. The company leverages social media and digital marketing tools to maintain engagement and brand visibility.

Security posture

The security maturity of BIT is solid, supported by ISO 27001:2022 certification and an industrial security certificate that allows handling confidential information. The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file indicate room for improvement. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could hinder timely reporting of security issues. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including a security.txt file, to improve transparency and responsiveness.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and communicate clear data retention policies and privacy practices to reinforce GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Baltijas Informācijas Tehnoloģijas, SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltijas Informācijas Tehnoloģijas SIA
Description
Baltijas Informācijas Tehnoloģijas (BIT) piedāvā IT pakalpojumus un IT apkalpošanu Jūsu biznesam, kā arī nodrošina oficiālo HP un HPE servisu.
Key services
IT infrastructure delivery, IT infrastructure implementation, IT infrastructure maintenance, Authorized HP, HPE, Acer service, Cybersecurity consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Revolution Slider, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of security certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong emphasis on certifications and trust
  3. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels
  4. Good GDPR and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanism
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No visible security or privacy red flags
  7. Social media presence on major platforms
  8. Partners include reputable IT vendors and service providers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, Owl Carousel and Revolution Slider for dynamic content presentation. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. Hosting is provided via Microsoft Online, suggesting reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses multiple CSS stylesheets and JavaScript libraries to deliver a rich user experience. Some technical debt is indicated by multiple versions of Google Tag Manager scripts and potential redundancy in scripts. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from optimization and modernization efforts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bit.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bit.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.