Skip to main content

Security report for bing.com

Microsoft Corporation · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Microsoft Bing is a globally recognized search engine operated by Microsoft Corporation, offering a wide range of search services including web, image, video, maps, and AI-powered features. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, with consistent branding and a user-friendly interface optimized for both desktop and mobile users. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are robust, reflecting compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and is hosted on Microsoft infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and high availability. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Overall, Bing represents a mature, enterprise-grade digital platform with a strong market position as a leading search engine alternative to Google.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bing.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bing.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bing.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
27,552
Employees
0
Customers
27,252
Third parties
300
Weak passwords
26%

51 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bing.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bing operates within the technology sector as an essential service under Microsoft Corporation. Its business model is primarily advertising-supported, leveraging Microsoft Advertising and integrated marketing tools like Microsoft Rewards. The platform targets a broad audience of internet users worldwide, providing search and discovery services. Bing's ecosystem includes partnerships with MSN, Microsoft 365, and Outlook, enhancing user engagement and cross-service integration. The site’s content and navigation reflect a focus on delivering relevant, timely information and multimedia content. Bing's market position as a major search engine is supported by its enterprise backing and continuous innovation in AI and search technologies.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, implied use of Content Security Policy, and secure handling of user inputs in search forms. No security headers were explicitly listed in the HTML but are likely present given Microsoft's standards. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is evident through cookie consent banners and links to comprehensive privacy policies. However, no explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which is common for large consumer-facing platforms that centralize such information elsewhere. Overall, Bing maintains a secure environment suitable for its scale and user base.

Recommendations

  1. Publish or link to a dedicated security policy and incident response page for transparency.
  2. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards.
  4. Provide clearer contact information for security and privacy inquiries.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to align with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Microsoft Corporation
Description
Microsoft Bing is a smart search engine powered by Microsoft, offering search capabilities including webpages, images, videos, maps, and AI-powered information retrieval.
Key services
Web Search, Image Search, Video Search, Maps, Shopping, News, AI-powered Copilot
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, SVG, CSS3, HTML5, XHR/AJAX, WebAssembly (possible)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Advertising
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Rewards
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong Microsoft branding and integration with Microsoft services.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage.
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected or not publicly available, common for major brands.
  6. No security challenges or WAF blocks detected.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and good performance observed.
Technical notes

Notes

Bing’s technical infrastructure is modern and robust, utilizing advanced JavaScript, SVG graphics, and asynchronous loading techniques to optimize user experience. The site is hosted on Microsoft Azure or equivalent Microsoft infrastructure, ensuring scalability and reliability. Performance is fast with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO and accessibility are well implemented, with proper meta tags and ARIA roles. The site uses Microsoft Clarity for analytics and Microsoft Advertising for monetization. No CMS was detected, likely due to custom Microsoft-built platform. Overall, the technical implementation supports a high-quality, enterprise-grade web service.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100 +2Low19 findingsView report
  2. 82/100 +4Low20 findingsView report
  3. 78/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.