Skip to main content

Security report for bigrock.com

BigRock · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BigRock is a well-established web presence solutions provider focusing on domain registration, web hosting, and related services primarily targeting small businesses, professionals, and individuals. The website indicates a transition away from the .com domain for new orders, directing new customers to the .in domain, which suggests a strategic regional focus. The company is part of Newfold Digital, a known parent company in the web services industry. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security practices include HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers are not evident in the provided content. The WHOIS data for the domain www.bigrock.com is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy from a user perspective but would benefit from improved security header implementation and clearer domain registration information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigrock.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BigRock holds a strong market position as a leading domain registrar and hosting provider with over 6 million domains under management. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive web presence solutions including domain registration, shared and reseller hosting, email hosting, SSL certificates, and website security services. The company targets small businesses and individual professionals, leveraging a broad product portfolio and a parent company infrastructure (Newfold Digital). The shift of new orders to the .in domain indicates a regional market focus on India. The company maintains active social media channels and provides multiple customer support channels, enhancing customer engagement and trust. The presence of multiple marketing and tracking tools suggests a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options in the provided HTML content is a notable gap. The login forms include CSRF protection tokens, which is a positive security control. The WHOIS data absence for the domain is a concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced header implementation and public security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Clarify and publish domain registration details or ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve trust and transparency.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate commitment to security and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BigRock
Description
BigRock is a leading provider of web-presence solutions to small businesses, professionals and individuals. They offer domain registration, web hosting, email hosting, and related services.
Key services
Domain registration, Linux and Windows web hosting, Reseller hosting, Business email hosting, SSL certificates, Website security (SiteLock), Backup services (CodeGuard)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs)
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Login form with CSRF protection token

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Sokrati tracker
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is operational and content is accessible
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Domain WHOIS data is missing or unavailable
  4. Site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant
  6. Site is focused on domain registration and hosting services
  7. Site indicates .com domain is no longer accepting new orders, redirecting new users to .in domain
  8. Contact information is available including phone numbers and login forms
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and various third-party analytics and marketing scripts including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and Sokrati tracker. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes cookie consent banners for GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with some deferred style loading and asynchronous script loading to improve speed. The site lacks visible CMS identification but is likely custom or proprietary given the structure. Hosting appears to be managed by Newfold Digital. SEO is basic with meta keywords and descriptions present but could be enhanced with structured data. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics and social media integration, which increases tracking but also marketing capabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from improved security and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigrock.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigrock.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.