Skip to main content

Security report for bigid.com

BigID · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BigID is a leading enterprise SaaS platform specializing in data security, privacy, compliance, AI risk, and governance. Founded in 2016, it has established a strong market position with a cloud-native platform recognized for its data discovery and classification accuracy. The company targets security, privacy, and AI data leaders, offering comprehensive solutions that cover structured and unstructured data across multiple environments. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, extensive content, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools integrated, including Google Tag Manager and Hotjar. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. However, some security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers are not enabled, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies were found in the provided content, which could be improved. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. The WHOIS data confirms legitimacy with consistent registrant information and a long domain history. The site uses multiple tracking pixels and marketing tools, indicating extensive user tracking, but privacy compliance mechanisms like cookie consent banners are not evident. Overall, BigID's website demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, though improvements in privacy compliance documentation and security headers would enhance its security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigid.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bigid.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
102
Employees
3
Customers
67
Third parties
32
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bigid.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –login.bigid.com2025-07-20
  • –community.bigid.com2025-07-20
  • –education.bigid.com2025-07-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BigID operates in the technology sector, focusing on enterprise data security and privacy solutions. Its business model revolves around providing a SaaS platform that integrates data discovery, classification, and governance with AI risk management. The company has a global footprint with offices in the US, UK, Israel, Singapore, and Mexico. It holds multiple industry awards and partnerships, reinforcing its competitive advantage. The target customers are large enterprises requiring comprehensive data security and privacy compliance solutions. The website content and structured data indicate a mature marketing strategy with strong emphasis on trust and innovation. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major cloud and security providers, enhancing its ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform usage and professional services. Growth indicators include recent awards and active content marketing. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting independent operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Forms appear to be standard with HubSpot integration, but no explicit security measures for forms were detailed. The absence of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency in incident handling. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and public vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BigID Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BigID
Description
Reduce risk, accelerate time to insight, and get data visibility and control across all your data - everywhere.
Key services
Data Discovery & Classification, Data Security Platform, Privacy Automation, AI Governance, Data Lifecycle Management, DSPM (Data Security Posture Management), Cloud DLP, Insider Risk Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cloudflare DNS, Various marketing and analytics scripts
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, StackAdapt
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
ZoomInfo, Spotify Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on data security, privacy, compliance, and AI governance.
  3. Multiple global office addresses and contact points listed.
  4. Extensive use of marketing and analytics tools with tracking pixels.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the provided content.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. WHOIS data supports domain legitimacy and long-term operation.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin for SEO optimization. It uses Google Tag Manager to manage multiple analytics and marketing scripts, including Hotjar for user behavior analysis. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing reliable DNS resolution and potential CDN benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with optimized images and video content. The presence of multiple tracking pixels indicates extensive user data collection for marketing purposes. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The technical infrastructure supports enterprise-grade operations but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigid.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigid.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.