Skip to main content

Security report for bigdistrict.com

Big District · Technology · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Big District is a French digital agency specializing in bespoke digital solutions including websites, event platforms, business applications, and contest games since 2012. The company targets businesses seeking digital transformation and user-centric digital products. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and CAPTCHA services to enhance user experience and security. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and bot protection, but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. Overall, the website presents a credible and trustworthy digital agency, but domain registration verification and enhanced privacy compliance are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigdistrict.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Big District operates in the technology and marketing sectors, offering a range of digital services from UX/UI design to application development and event site creation. The agency has a portfolio of notable clients and projects, supported by client testimonials that emphasize creativity, responsiveness, and expertise. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on custom digital solutions for corporate clients. The company appears to be a small-sized entity based in France, founded in 2012. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a strong market position in the French digital agency landscape. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The agency leverages modern digital marketing and analytics tools to support client engagement and growth.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates bot protection mechanisms such as Google reCAPTCHA and Cloudflare Turnstile, which are positive security practices. However, no security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency in handling security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data is a potential risk factor for domain ownership verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be improved with additional headers and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Big District
Description
Agence digitale produisant depuis 2012 des solutions sur-mesure telles que sites internet, plateformes événementielles, applications métiers, jeu-concours.
Key services
Site vitrine, Application métier, Maintenance & hébergement, Gestion d’invitations, Jeu-concours, Site événementiel sur-mesure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare Turnstile, Splide.js, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA and Cloudflare Turnstile for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is present but no email addresses found in HTML.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and security measures like HTTPS and CAPTCHA.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
  7. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Strong client testimonials and portfolio indicate business credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js for sliders and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit. The site uses Cloudflare Turnstile and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and performance optimizations for faster load times.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigdistrict.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigdistrict.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.