Skip to main content

Security report for bigblue.com.br

Big Blue · Technology · Brazil

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Big Blue is a Brazilian IT services company established in 1991, with a strong presence in major Brazilian capitals including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Belo Horizonte. The company specializes in providing comprehensive IT solutions such as support and monitoring, cloud services, data center moving, network environment management, and structured asset leasing. It maintains strategic partnerships with major hardware manufacturers like IBM, HP, SUN, EMC, and Dell, and offers 24/7 customer support. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress and Elementor, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security headers, though there is room for improvement in privacy compliance and incident response transparency. Overall, the company presents as a credible and established player in the Brazilian technology sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigblue.com.br

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Big Blue operates in the technology sector, targeting medium to large enterprises requiring critical IT infrastructure services. Its business model revolves around service provision and technology solutions integration, leveraging partnerships with leading hardware vendors to enhance its offerings. The company’s market position is strong within Brazil, supported by a skilled technical team and a broad service portfolio. The website content and structure indicate a focus on professional service delivery and customer engagement through contact forms and partner links. However, the absence of direct contact details and limited social media presence may restrict broader customer outreach. The company’s strategic focus on cloud solutions and business continuity planning aligns with current market demands, suggesting growth potential and adaptability.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and includes some security headers, indicating a baseline security awareness. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms also points to potential compliance issues with privacy regulations such as GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by formalizing policies, improving user privacy controls, and providing clear channels for security communications.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible and comprehensive cookie consent banner to ensure privacy compliance.
  2. Publish detailed security and incident response policies accessible from the website footer or dedicated pages.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Big Blue
Description
Empresa de TI fundada em 1991, com presença nas principais capitais brasileiras, especializada em serviços de suporte, monitoramento, soluções em nuvem, data center moving, gestão de ambiente de rede e locação de ativos de TI. Reconhecida por parcerias com grandes fabricantes como IBM, HP, SUN, EMC e Dell, oferece atendimento 24/7 e soluções integradas de hardware e software.
Key services
Suporte e Monitoramento, Soluções em Nuvem, Data Center Moving, Gestão de Ambiente de Rede, Plano de Continuidade de Negócios, Locação de Ativos de TI
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Slick Slider, Isotope, LightGallery, Header Footer Elementor, Contact Form 7, The Plus Addons for Elementor, Royal Elementor Addons, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security nonce in AJAX calls

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
GTranslate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found, which may affect compliance.
  3. Security headers are partially present; SSL is properly configured.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage; contact is via forms.
  5. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn.
  6. No evidence of security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. Use of multiple WordPress plugins and Elementor for site building.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and several supporting plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Royal Elementor Addons. It uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Slick Slider, Isotope, and LightGallery for interactive and media-rich content. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and integrates a language translation widget (GTranslate). Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. The technical stack is standard for professional corporate websites but could benefit from optimization and enhanced accessibility features. No critical technical vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigblue.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigblue.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.