Skip to main content

Security report for bidding-fox.cz

Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o. operates the website bidding-fox.cz, providing an automated bidding solution for e-commerce platforms Heureka.cz, Heureka.sk, and Zboží.cz. The company offers a SaaS product integrated with the Mergado platform, targeting e-shops seeking to optimize their paid product listings. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and includes certified marketing partners, enhancing its market credibility. Technically, the site uses Drupal CMS with modern libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and MailerLite. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS data and privacy policy pages slightly reduce trust but do not critically impair the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-positioned in the Czech e-commerce technology sector with a clear business model and active digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bidding-fox.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong position in the Czech and Slovak e-commerce market by providing automated bidding tools that improve advertising efficiency on popular product search engines. Its partnership with Mergado and certification by Heureka and APEK reinforce its credibility. The business model is subscription-based with a fixed monthly fee, appealing to both small and large e-shops. The presence of certified marketing agencies as partners indicates a robust ecosystem supporting client success. The website content and blog demonstrate ongoing engagement and thought leadership in bidding automation. However, the lack of publicly available privacy and security policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent with detailed categorization, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, it lacks a published privacy policy and terms of service, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Security headers are minimal, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The presence of suspicious hidden links to unrelated gambling domains in the footer is a concern and may indicate SEO spam or compromised content injection. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting comprehensive security headers, publishing policies, and removing suspicious links.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Remove suspicious hidden links in the footer to prevent SEO penalties and potential security risks.
  4. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance security transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ04677200
Registration number
04677200
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Bidding Fox is an automated bidding tool for product search engines Heureka.cz, Heureka.sk, and Zboží.cz, enabling efficient bidding management and optimization for e-shops.
Key services
Automated bidding for product search engines, Bidding strategy management, Product performance diagnostics, Competitor comparison, Integration with Mergado platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, MailerLite
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Mergado integration
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MailerLite, CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found on main site.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company emails and physical addresses.
  6. Multiple social media channels are linked and active.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and integration with marketing and analytics tools.
  8. Presence of suspicious hidden links to unrelated gambling and casino domains in footer area, possibly SEO spam or injected content.
  9. Certifications and memberships displayed add to trustworthiness.
  10. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, ensuring responsive design and moderate performance. Integration with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and MailerLite indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The presence of multiple external scripts may impact load times, suggesting optimization opportunities. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration details is a technical gap affecting trust verification. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bidding-fox.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bidding-fox.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.