Skip to main content

Security report for bidding-audit.sk

Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o. operates the bidding-audit.sk website, providing free bidding audits to e-commerce businesses to optimize their product offers on price comparison platforms. The company is positioned as a niche service provider in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, leveraging technology and data analytics to improve bidding efficiency. The website is built on a modern React framework, integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and uses CookieHub for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates good technical maturity and business credibility with professional design and clear content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bidding-audit.sk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets e-commerce businesses seeking to improve their bidding strategies on platforms like Heureka and Zboží. Their business model focuses on SaaS and consulting services related to bidding audits and feed optimization. The website features client testimonials and links to related services under the parent company Profitak group. The presence of sister sites and partner domains indicates a regional market focus. The company maintains a consistent brand and offers clear value propositions to its target audience. Growth potential is supported by integration with popular e-commerce tools and platforms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries to improve trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o.
Registration number
04677200
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Service offering free bidding audits to analyze and improve the success and competitiveness of product offers on price comparison platforms.
Key services
Bidding audit, Product feed analysis, Recommendations for bidding improvements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieHub
Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements.
  3. Professional business focus on bidding audits for e-commerce.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Clear branding and consistent messaging.
  6. No exposed security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form or linked contact page.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a React-based single page application with asynchronous loading of scripts and styles. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and CookieHub for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading. No CMS detected, indicating a custom-built solution. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with opportunities for enhanced security and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bidding-audit.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bidding-audit.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.