Skip to main content

Security report for biblioteki.org

Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Informacyjnego · Education · Poland

Partial score · DNS & email only

54/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biblioteki.org is a well-established Polish non-profit portal dedicated to supporting library professionals with educational materials, project information, webinars, and e-learning courses. It operates under the auspices of the Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Informacyjnego and partners with notable foundations such as the Polsko-Amerykańska Fundacja Wolności. The website serves as a national resource hub, fostering community engagement and professional development in the library sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Yoast SEO and uses Google Analytics for traffic insights. It is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is transparent, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biblioteki.org

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
54

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal occupies a strong position in the Polish educational and non-profit sector, focusing on library development and community support. Its business model revolves around providing free educational content and project support, funded and supported by foundations. The target audience includes librarians and library institutions across Poland. The site demonstrates growth through diverse content types and partnerships with recognized organizations. Its ecosystem includes related domains such as frsi.org.pl and pafw.pl, which are key partners. The portal's content quality and branding consistency reinforce its market presence and trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection. However, it lacks DNSSEC and important HTTP security headers, which could be improved to mitigate risks such as DNS spoofing and clickjacking. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is a gap in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in DNS security and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Continue enhancing privacy compliance and user data protection practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Informacyjnego
Description
Ogólnopolski portal dla bibliotekarek i bibliotekarzy z materiałami edukacyjnymi i informacjami o projektach i wydarzeniach FRSI. Zdobywaj i poszerzaj wiedzę, rozwijaj umiejętności, korzystaj z naszych zasobów!
Key services
educational materials, project information, webinars, publications, e-learning courses, community projects
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js, Material UI (CSS classes detected), Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established Polish non-profit portal for library professionals.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with visible policies and consent mechanisms.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for optimization and jQuery for scripting. It employs Swiper.js for interactive sliders and Material UI CSS classes indicating use of modern UI components. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA labels. Hosting appears to be via Netventure based on DNS servers. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. Technical debt is low, but security header implementation and DNSSEC absence represent modernization opportunities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biblioteki.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biblioteki.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.