Skip to main content

Security report for bi4dynamics.com

BI4Dynamics - All-in-One Business intelligence for Microsoft Dynamics · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BI4Dynamics is a specialized software provider offering business intelligence solutions tailored for Microsoft Dynamics ERP systems. Their product suite includes ready-to-use Power BI dashboards and data modeling tools designed to deliver actionable insights with minimal setup. The company targets businesses using Microsoft Dynamics seeking enhanced analytics capabilities. The website demonstrates a professional and modern digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, integrating analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and MailerLite. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though the absence of a published security policy and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, which should be further investigated. Overall, the site is functional, secure, and business-focused, but would benefit from enhanced transparency and direct contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bi4dynamics.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market in providing BI solutions for Microsoft Dynamics users, leveraging Power BI technology to simplify data visualization and reporting. Their business model centers on software sales and support, targeting medium to large enterprises that require advanced analytics without extensive custom development. The presence of social media channels and marketing integrations suggests active engagement with their customer base. The lack of detailed company registration or founding information limits deeper insights into their corporate structure or scale. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company appears to maintain a focused product offering with a clear value proposition in the BI space.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers, indicating a mature security baseline. Cookie consent and privacy policies reflect GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is standard but should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools for security compliance.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BI4Dynamics - All-in-One Business intelligence for Microsoft Dynamics
Description
Business Intelligence for any version of Microsoft Dynamics. Ready-to-use Solution. Power BI visual dashboards. Less Modeling, More Insights!
Key services
Business Intelligence solutions, Power BI dashboards, Data modeling for Microsoft Dynamics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, MailerLite
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with explicit withdrawal
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
MailerLite
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on business intelligence solutions for Microsoft Dynamics.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML; contact likely via form.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, supported by jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and MailerLite for marketing automation. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO best practices are followed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema for organization and webpage. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business scale, though opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and performance further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bi4dynamics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bi4dynamics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.