Skip to main content

Security report for bhe.de

BHE Bundesverband Sicherheitstechnik e.V. · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BHE Bundesverband Sicherheitstechnik e.V. is a leading German non-profit industry association specializing in security technology. The organization provides certifications, training programs, publications, and advocacy services to security professionals, companies, and planners. Their market position is strong within Germany, supported by multiple certification schemes and a broad network of industry partners. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting security technology stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on the Neos CMS platform using the Flow PHP framework, hosted by punkt.de GmbH. It employs modern web technologies with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. The site uses Matomo analytics with cookies disabled, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. However, some security best practices such as security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses privacy-friendly analytics but lacks explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the domain and business. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture with room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations to enhance security headers, implement cookie consent, and publish incident response information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bhe.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bhe.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
24
Employees
0
Customers
24
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bhe.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BHE operates as a specialized non-profit association in the security technology sector, offering certifications, training, and advocacy. Its competitive advantage lies in its recognized certification programs and comprehensive industry knowledge resources. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, training fees, and publication sales. The target customers are security technology companies, planners, manufacturers, and end users seeking certified expertise. The organization maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with dedicated portals and industry events, reinforcing its market presence and growth potential.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-respecting analytics. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. Lack of a public vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contacts may delay handling of security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from formalized incident response and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve readiness and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced and maintain up-to-date software versions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BHE Bundesverband Sicherheitstechnik e.V.
Description
Fachverband für Sicherheitstechnik in Deutschland, offering certifications, training, publications, and industry representation.
Key services
Certification programs, Training and seminars, Industry advocacy, Publications and guidelines, Fachfirmensuche (specialist company search), Membership services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Neos CMS, Flow PHP Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Matomo analytics with disabled cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured for the security technology industry.
  3. Strong presence of certifications and industry standards.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, though privacy policy is present.
  5. Use of Matomo analytics with disabled cookies indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
  6. Multiple social media channels linked, enhancing trust and engagement.
  7. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for security hardening.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistent domain registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Neos CMS and the Flow PHP framework, indicating a modern and enterprise-grade content management infrastructure. Hosting is provided by punkt.de GmbH, a German hosting provider. The site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with responsive design for mobile devices. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The use of Matomo analytics with disabled cookies reflects a privacy-aware approach. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for optimization in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bhe.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bhe.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.