Skip to main content

Security report for bgtec.com

BG Tec · Technology · Gibraltar

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BG Tec operates as the technology and software development division of the Bland Group, providing a broad range of IT services including helpdesk support, VoIP, network management, backup and recovery, and software development. The company targets government entities, private companies, and law enforcement agencies, positioning itself as a trusted and agile technology partner. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and contact channels. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks such as Blazor and Bootstrap, integrates Microsoft Azure monitoring and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for security and analytics, and is hosted likely on Azure infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility and SEO could be enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain protection but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improved resilience. Security-wise, the company demonstrates good practices including certifications like ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials, but lacks a public vulnerability disclosure policy and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for compliance and transparency. No WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with site access, allowing full content analysis. Overall, BG Tec presents a credible and professional online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bgtec.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BG Tec benefits from its affiliation with the Bland Group, leveraging established market presence and trust. Its business model focuses on B2B IT services and software development, serving critical sectors such as government and law enforcement. The company’s certifications and partnerships with major technology vendors like Microsoft, Fortinet, and Acronis enhance its competitive advantage. The website indicates a small-sized but specialized operation with a clear focus on technology solutions. Growth potential lies in expanding service offerings and improving digital maturity. The partnership ecosystem is robust, supporting a comprehensive service portfolio.

Security posture

The security maturity of BG Tec is moderate to good. The use of HTTPS, reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and Application Insights monitoring reflects awareness of security and operational monitoring. Certifications such as ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials indicate formalized security management. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and a vulnerability disclosure policy reveals gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No incident response contacts or security policies are publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to threats. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with targeted measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact information to improve security incident handling and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BG Tec
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BG Tec
Description
BG Tec is the cutting-edge technology and software development arm of the Bland Group. They provide a comprehensive suite of IT services including Helpdesk support, VoIP solutions, server administration, network management, backup and recovery, and software development for desktop, mobile, and web applications. They serve government departments, private companies, and law enforcement agencies.
Key services
Helpdesk and end-user support, VoIP solutions, Server administration and network management, Backup and recovery, Software development (desktop, mobile, web)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Bootstrap Icons, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Microsoft Application Insights, Blazor Server, Azure Monitoring
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Blazor
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise on contact form
  • Application Insights monitoring for telemetry and error tracking
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js), Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to IT services and software development.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers, physical address, and a contact form secured by reCAPTCHA.
  4. Multiple industry certifications and partner logos are displayed, enhancing trust.
  5. No explicit cookie policy or terms of service found on the site.
  6. Security practices are good but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  7. Use of modern technologies like Blazor and Azure monitoring indicates a mature technical infrastructure.
  8. No social media links detected on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design and Blazor Server for interactive UI components. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot mitigation and Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry and error tracking, indicating a mature monitoring setup. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, leveraging cloud scalability and security. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in SEO and accessibility. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or framework-based site. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy mechanisms are recommended to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bgtec.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bgtec.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.