Skip to main content

Security report for bezpeka.ua

Technology · Ukraine

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Security 2.0 is a prominent Ukrainian industry event platform specializing in security equipment, technologies, humanitarian demining, civil protection, and first aid. The website serves as the main portal for event information, including exhibitions and demonstration sessions scheduled for 2025. The target audience includes industry professionals, government agencies, and humanitarian organizations. The business model centers on event organization and industry networking within the Ukrainian security sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Kadence theme, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Tippy.js for UI enhancements. It integrates analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Smartlook, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with good user experience, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. No forms or direct contact information are present on the main page, limiting user engagement and incident response readiness. Tracking scripts suggest moderate user tracking without clear privacy compliance disclosures. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security header implementation, and clearer contact channels. These improvements would strengthen trustworthiness and regulatory adherence, reducing potential risks associated with data protection and incident management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bezpeka.ua

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Security 2.0 holds a leading position in Ukraine's security and civil protection event market, focusing on technology exhibitions and forums. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialization and government/industry alignment. The business model is event-driven, generating revenue through exhibitions and related services. Target customers include security technology providers, emergency responders, and humanitarian groups. Growth indicators include scheduled events for 2025 and active social media presence. The partnership ecosystem includes related subdomains hosting specialized events. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for expanding digital engagement and compliance to enhance market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. Lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided, limiting readiness for security events. The use of third-party tracking scripts without clear consent mechanisms further impacts privacy posture. Overall, the security culture appears functional but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incident reporting and designate an incident response contact channel.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and third-party scripts to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Security 2.0 is the main industry event in Ukraine focused on security equipment and technologies, humanitarian demining, civil protection, and first aid. It includes exhibitions and forums such as Security 2.0, Пожежна безпека та управління надзвичайними ситуаціями (Fire Safety and Emergency Management), and related demonstration sessions.
Key services
Industry exhibitions, Forums and conferences, Demonstration sessions, Information dissemination on security technologies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Kadence Theme, jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js, Tippy.js, Smartlook, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an event platform for security and civil protection exhibitions in Ukraine.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Kadence theme and common JS libraries.
  5. Includes tracking scripts for analytics and marketing (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Smartlook).
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No forms detected on the main page for data collection.
  8. Content is in Ukrainian language with some English alternate links.
  9. Social media links to Facebook and Instagram official event pages present.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with the Kadence theme, leveraging popular JavaScript libraries for UI and interaction. Performance is moderate with preloaded fonts and optimized images. The site is mobile responsive and uses standard SEO meta tags. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The integration of analytics and marketing tools is comprehensive but lacks privacy transparency. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins and missing security headers, which should be addressed to maintain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bezpeka.ua. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bezpeka.ua.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.