Skip to main content

Security report for ntrade.bezkomisijas.lv

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at bezkomisijas.lv currently serves as a security challenge page implemented by BitNinja, requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to proceed. This indicates the domain is used primarily for bot mitigation and cybercrime prevention rather than traditional business or content delivery. The page supports multiple languages and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics for visitor validation and tracking. The technical infrastructure references outdated CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) in meta tags, likely remnants or placeholders rather than active CMS usage. Security posture is moderate due to CAPTCHA usage but lacks visible security headers and updated CMS versions, which could pose risks if the site were fully operational. Privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies are absent, and no contact or business information is provided, limiting trust and compliance assessment. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain's use by BitNinja suggests legitimacy in the security context. Overall, the site functions as a security gateway rather than a business-facing website, resulting in limited content and business insights.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ntrade.bezkomisijas.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain bezkomisijas.lv appears to be utilized as a security checkpoint by BitNinja, a cybersecurity service provider specializing in bot mitigation and IP greylisting. There is no direct business information, contact details, or commercial content on the page. The business model implied is security service provision, focusing on filtering malicious traffic and preventing automated abuse. The target audience is general internet users attempting to access the site who may have been flagged for suspicious activity. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of business credentials, suggests this domain is not intended for direct customer engagement but rather as a technical security layer. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates some level of visitor tracking for security or analytics purposes.

Security posture

The security posture of the site is characterized by the use of BitNinja's greylist technology and CAPTCHA challenges to block automated or malicious visitors. This is a positive security control to mitigate bot traffic. However, the site shows signs of outdated CMS platforms in meta tags, which if active, could represent vulnerabilities. No security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) are evident from the provided data, and SSL/TLS configuration details are not available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap. The CAPTCHA implementation and IP blocking are strengths, but overall security hygiene could be improved by updating CMS software, adding security headers, and publishing compliance documentation. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, limiting transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Update or remove outdated CMS references to prevent security risks.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure SSL/TLS is properly configured and enforced site-wide.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide contact information or security incident response channels for transparency.
  6. Regularly review and update CAPTCHA and IP greylist rules to balance security and user experience.
  7. Improve accessibility and SEO to enhance usability if the site expands beyond a security gateway.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The page is a security challenge page by BitNinja requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed, indicating visitor access is blocked until validation. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This website is a security validation page that requires visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to continue browsing. It is designed to block or filter automated or malicious traffic using BitNinja's greylist technology.
Key services
IP blocking and greylist management, CAPTCHA-based visitor validation, Cybercrime prevention
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal (mentioned in meta keywords), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, BitNinja security platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of CAPTCHA to prevent automated access
  • IP greylisting via BitNinja

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is a CAPTCHA challenge page by BitNinja to block automated or malicious traffic.
  2. No business or contact information is provided on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found.
  4. The page uses outdated CMS meta tags but likely serves only as a security gateway.
  5. Multiple languages supported for CAPTCHA instructions.
  6. No emails, phone numbers, or social media links found.
  7. External scripts include Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details available.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses legacy CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and unsupported, posing potential security risks if active. The actual page content is minimal and serves as a CAPTCHA challenge powered by BitNinja. External scripts include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA v2, indicating visitor tracking and bot mitigation. The page is mobile responsive to a basic degree and uses inline CSS for styling. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries are detected. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate given the simple page structure but could be improved with modern optimizations. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or advanced features detected. SEO is poor due to minimal content and meta tags focused on CMS keywords rather than business relevance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ntrade.bezkomisijas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ntrade.bezkomisijas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.