Skip to main content

Security report for betradar.com

Betradar · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Betradar is a globally recognized leader in providing sports betting data and related services, operating as a key brand under Sportradar AG. The company offers a comprehensive suite of products including pre-match and live odds, virtual sports, live streaming, and managed trading services, targeting sports betting operators and gaming companies worldwide. Their market position is strong, supported by a well-established domain and consistent branding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern analytics and SEO tools, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer protection, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security documentation is missing. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service documentation. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences interested in sports betting data services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching betradar.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Betradar operates in the technology and media sectors, focusing on B2B services for the sports betting and gaming industries. Their business model revolves around supplying data, content, and streaming solutions to betting operators, supported by managed trading and risk management services. The company benefits from a strong parent brand, Sportradar AG, enhancing credibility and market reach. Their product portfolio is diverse, covering virtual sports, live data, and engagement tools, positioning them as a comprehensive provider in the market. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design and SEO optimization, indicating a focus on growth and customer acquisition. Partnerships and integrations with Sportradar and other domains suggest a robust ecosystem. However, the absence of direct contact details and some compliance documents may limit transparency for some stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection status set to clientTransferProhibited, reducing risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The lack of DNSSEC is a minor vulnerability that could expose DNS spoofing risks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness for security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, showing awareness of privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a large enterprise but could be improved by publishing security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and providing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service prominently on the website.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Betradar
Description
Betradar is the world's leading supplier and provider of sports betting data services. The one-stop shop for betting, content, streaming & gaming solutions.
Key services
Pre-Match Odds Service, Live Odds Service, Alpha Odds, Live Data Service, Numbers Betting, Simulated Reality, Virtual Sports, Casino Games, Managed Trading Services, Live Streaming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Piwik PRO, YouTube iframe API, FontAwesome, Yoast SEO plugin, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited status on domain
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Piwik PRO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with modern SEO and analytics tools.
  3. Implements cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found in provided content.
  5. No direct contact information or security policy pages detected.
  6. Domain is well-established and consistent with business claims.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Content is safe and targeted at general audience interested in sports betting data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. It integrates Google Analytics and Piwik PRO for analytics and tracking, with a cookie consent mechanism controlling data collection. Hosting is via Amazon AWS, inferred from DNS servers, providing reliable infrastructure. SEO is enhanced through Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is used for rich search results. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were identified, indicating a well-maintained technical stack suitable for enterprise operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with betradar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review betradar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.