Skip to main content

Security report for betlogik.com

BetLogik · Technology · Bulgaria

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

26/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BetLogik is a small technology company specializing in white label sportsbook and casino betting platform solutions. Their website presents a professional and modern interface built on WordPress with Elementor and Slider Revolution. They offer a broad range of betting services including sportsbook, live casino, street betting POS, and cross-platform solutions, targeting gaming operators and betting shops. The company provides contact information including a physical address in Bulgaria, phone number, and email, enhancing business credibility. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized, but performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks important security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching betlogik.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
26

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BetLogik positions itself as a reliable partner in the betting platform market, offering customizable white label solutions with competitive pricing models. Their business model includes setup fees and monthly fees based on profits. The company targets operators in regions where street betting is prevalent, including Africa, and supports multi-currency and cryptocurrency payments. The website content emphasizes risk management, agent systems, and jackpot betting as key differentiators. The lack of visible certifications or compliance documentation may impact trust with larger clients. The company appears to be small-sized with a focus on technology sector and gaming industry. The presence of a contact form with reCAPTCHA and clear contact details supports lead generation and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No published security or incident response policies were found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The WHOIS privacy protection reduces transparency. There is no indication of vulnerability scanning or patch management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy)
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting
  4. Provide incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BetLogik
Description
BetLogik offers white label sportsbook and casino betting platform solutions including sportsbook, live casino, street betting, and cross-platform services. They provide over 30,000 live events monthly, custom odds, risk management, agent systems, and multi-currency support.
Key services
Sportsbook platform, Live casino integration, Street betting POS system, Cross-platform mobile and desktop solutions, Risk management, Agent system, Integrated payment with cryptocurrencies, Jackpot betting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor page builder, Slider Revolution 6.5.30, Contact Form 7 plugin, Google reCAPTCHA v3, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap CSS, Ionicons, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Roboto, Open Sans)
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based white label sportsbook and casino platform provider
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including physical address in Bulgaria, phone, and email
  4. Contact form uses Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection
  5. No visible security policies or incident response information
  6. No visible certifications or compliance badges
  7. Website uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible
  9. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using Elementor and Slider Revolution plugins, with Contact Form 7 for forms and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. It uses Bootstrap CSS and Ionicons for styling and icons, and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.7.1. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider assets. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility is basic with skip links and some ARIA attributes but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business WordPress site but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with betlogik.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review betlogik.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.