Skip to main content

Security report for betgames.tv

BetGames · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BetGames is a prominent provider in the live dealer online gaming industry, offering innovative gaming platforms and lottery solutions with minimal stakes. The company collaborates with over 180 international partners, positioning itself as a leader in the B2B gaming technology sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on modern frameworks such as React and Gatsby, delivering excellent performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including consent mechanisms. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, though the lack of public WHOIS data slightly reduces transparency. Strategic recommendations include publishing security policies and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching betgames.tv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention betgames.tv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
77
Employees
30
Customers
41
Third parties
6
Weak passwords
1%

Latest record dated 2026-06-06 · 13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for betgames.tv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –betgames.tv2026-06-06
  • –integrations01-backoffice.betgames.tv2026-05-25
  • –fs.betgames.tv2026-05-15
  • –integrations01-backoffice.betgames.tv2026-05-15
  • –fs.betgames.tv2026-05-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BetGames operates as a B2B technology provider specializing in live dealer and lottery gaming platforms. Their market positioning is strong, supported by extensive international partnerships and a focus on innovative gaming solutions. The business model centers on providing scalable gaming platforms to online casinos and operators. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a clear target audience of gaming operators and players. The company leverages modern web technologies and maintains a professional brand image. Tracking and marketing tools such as LinkedIn Insight and Leadfeeder are used to support business intelligence and lead generation efforts.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, reflecting a solid security baseline. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information represents a gap in transparency and readiness. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BetGames
Description
BetGames is a leading provider in the live dealer online gaming industry, offering games with minimal stakes and unique solutions using advanced technologies. They cooperate with more than 180 international partners.
Key services
Live dealer games, Lottery games, Gaming platform solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight, Leadfeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Professional and modern design with clear navigation
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  8. Tracking scripts from LinkedIn and Leadfeeder present
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, ensuring fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The use of CSS modules and optimized images contributes to performance and user experience. SEO is well addressed with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced with ARIA roles and landmarks. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses third-party tracking scripts from LinkedIn and Leadfeeder for marketing and analytics purposes. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports the business objectives effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with betgames.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review betgames.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.