Skip to main content

Security report for beeweb.eu

BEE WEB SRL · Technology · Romania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BEE WEB SRL is a Romanian-based small enterprise specializing in digital marketing education and services, including web design, SEO & SEM, email marketing, social media marketing, and web analytics. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking to enhance their digital marketing skills and online presence. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform for their e-learning courses and marketing services. Technically, the website is built using Adobe Muse with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, including jQuery 1.8.3 and RequireJS. It is hosted by Aruba S.p.A., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site is mobile responsive and has a moderate performance profile but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is limited; no HTTPS status or security headers were identified in the provided data, and the site uses an outdated JavaScript library version. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no incident response or security contact information is provided, indicating gaps in compliance and security readiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beeweb.eu

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital marketing education and services. Its business model combines service provision with e-learning offerings, targeting a niche market in Romania. The firm appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2015, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website content is consistent with the company's stated business, but lacks comprehensive trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The absence of social media links and limited external partnerships suggest a focused but modest market presence. The company uses Aruba S.p.A. as its registrar and likely hosting provider, indicating a preference for established European infrastructure. Growth opportunities may exist by enhancing digital marketing efforts and expanding service offerings.

Security posture

The website's security posture is basic and could be improved. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or modern security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) poses potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may lead to non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies further limits the organization's ability to manage security incidents effectively. No forms or user input fields were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the security maturity level is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information and establish a security policy framework.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BEE WEB SRL
VAT number
RO35008880
Registration number
J40/11319/2015
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BEE WEB SRL
Description
Internet company offering digital marketing courses and services including web design, SEO & SEM, email marketing, social media marketing, search engine marketing, web analytics and testing.
Key services
WEB DESIGN, SEO & SEM, EMAIL MARKETING, SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING, SEARCH ENGINE MARKETING, WEB ANALYTICS & TESTING
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 1.8.3, RequireJS
Frameworks
Adobe Muse
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small Romanian digital marketing education and service provider.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to email and physical address in footer; no phone numbers or contact forms detected.
  4. No security policies or incident response contacts provided.
  5. Website built with Adobe Muse and uses older jQuery version 1.8.3.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No external links except Google Fonts.
  8. No social media links found.
  9. No forms present on the website.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Adobe Muse, leveraging HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with RequireJS and jQuery 1.8.3. The tech stack is somewhat outdated, particularly the jQuery version, which may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts for typography. Hosting is managed by Aruba S.p.A., a reputable provider. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are limited. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating minimal user data collection. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but would benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beeweb.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beeweb.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.