Skip to main content

Security report for beenox.com

Beenox · Technology · Canada

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beenox is a well-established video game development studio founded in 1999, primarily known for its work on the Call of Duty franchise. The company targets gamers and industry professionals, emphasizing collaborative and ambitious game creation. The website is professionally designed using WordPress CMS and integrates modern technologies such as Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though minor backend PHP notices are visible, indicating some code maintenance is needed. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the company's history, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beenox.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Beenox operates as a large technology company within the video game development sector, focusing on high-profile game titles. The business model revolves around game development services, likely as a subsidiary or partner within a larger publishing ecosystem. The website content and domain age support a mature market position. The company leverages digital marketing tools and tracking services to engage its audience and potential employees. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. The company does not publicly display direct contact emails or phone numbers but provides a contact form for inquiries.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock enabled. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. Visible PHP notices in the HTML source could potentially leak information and should be addressed. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or incident response contact information, which are important for security readiness. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no detailed privacy policy found. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Fix PHP notices and errors to prevent information leakage and improve backend stability.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement and enable DNSSEC to improve domain security.
  4. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to harden the website against common attacks.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact information to improve security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Beenox
Description
Beenox is a video game development studio focused on creating iconic entertainment experiences, notably contributing to the Call of Duty franchise. The site emphasizes collaborative, ambitious game development.
Key services
Video game development, Game design and production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No privacy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  4. Minor PHP notices visible in HTML source indicating backend code issues.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form exists.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Gravity Forms plugin.
  7. Uses Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and bot protection.
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response info on site.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Gravity Forms plugin for form handling and uses jQuery as a JavaScript library. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics and bot protection. The hosting environment uses Cloudflare DNS but the actual hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern video and image formats for performance. Minor technical debt is indicated by PHP notices visible in the HTML source. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility features are basic but present. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized media assets.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beenox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beenox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.