Skip to main content

Security report for beefee.co.uk

Bee-Fee Ltd. · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bee-Fee Ltd. is a UK-registered company founded in 2013 specializing in the development of premium online casino gaming software, sports betting platforms, slot game development, and slot machine manufacturing. The company holds reputable licenses from the UK Gambling Commission and Malta Gaming Authority, positioning it as a credible and regulated player in the gambling technology sector. Their offerings include bespoke gaming solutions, back office software, legal and technical support, and affiliate program management, targeting online and land-based casino operators. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to their B2B audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and AOS for enhanced user experience. Cookiebot is implemented for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some improvements in accessibility and security headers could be made. Performance is moderate with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and explicit public security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, Bee-Fee Ltd. presents a solid digital presence with good compliance and security posture for its industry. Strategic enhancements in security headers, incident response transparency, and terms of service publication would further strengthen their risk management and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beefee.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bee-Fee Ltd. operates in the gambling technology sector, offering software and hardware solutions for online casinos and sports betting platforms. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive product portfolio, including bespoke slot games and land-based slot machines, supported by licensed operations in the UK and Malta. The business model is B2B, focusing on partnerships with casino operators and affiliates. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, hardware sales, and affiliate commissions. The company targets regulated markets in Europe, leveraging its licenses and certifications to build trust. Growth indicators include continuous platform development and exclusive affiliate programs. The partnership ecosystem includes regulatory bodies and technology providers, with a subsidiary company in Malta supporting operations. The company demonstrates a strategic focus on innovation, compliance, and customer-centric solutions.

Security posture

Bee-Fee Ltd. maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. The absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms appear secure with no visible injection points. However, the lack of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency. The company holds valid gambling licenses, which require adherence to regulatory security standards, indicating a baseline security maturity. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from enhanced public documentation and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries and plugins to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced through dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bee-Fee Limited
Registration number
08634758
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bee-Fee Ltd.
Description
Founded in 2013, Bee-Fee Ltd. is a modern slot game development studio and IT service provider for online casinos and sports betting. They develop innovative platforms for online casinos and sports betting, provide land-based points, bespoke slot games, and manufacture slot machines. They offer back office software, legal advice, technical support, analytical tools, and exclusive affiliate programs.
Key services
Online casino platform development, Sports betting platform development, Slot game development, Slot machines manufacturing, Back office software and support, Affiliate program management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Swiper.js, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Fancybox, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Email marketing tools (mentioned)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls.
  3. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  4. No explicit terms of service page found.
  5. Contact information includes physical addresses and contact form but no direct emails or phone numbers visible.
  6. Business is licensed and regulated by reputable gambling authorities.
  7. Website built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries.
  8. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious redirects.
  9. Content is professionally presented and relevant to gambling software development.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, AOS for animations, and Fancybox for media display. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, reflecting GDPR compliance. The site uses Google Fonts and loads resources from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with no critical errors or broken elements detected. Mobile optimization is good, supporting responsive design. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumb. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential technical debt from WordPress plugin dependencies. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beefee.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beefee.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.