Skip to main content

Security report for beecode.io

beecode, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

beecode, s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based small technology company specializing in native mobile and web application development. Their expertise spans Android (Kotlin), iOS (Swift), and web technologies including Node.js, TypeScript, and Vue.js. The company serves clients primarily in the education and municipal sectors, delivering custom information systems and apps that improve user experience and operational efficiency. Their market position is that of a niche regional player with a strong portfolio of university and city projects. Technically, the website reflects a modern and professional digital presence with good mobile optimization and use of contemporary frameworks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS in place but lacking advanced security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, but the website content and business registration details support legitimacy. Overall, the company demonstrates a solid technical foundation and credible business presence, though improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beecode.io

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

beecode operates a service-based business model focused on custom software development for mobile and web platforms. Their competitive advantage lies in their flexible microservice backend architecture (IS/beecode) and multi-platform native app development capabilities. The company targets educational institutions, municipalities, and scientific organizations, providing tailored solutions such as university apps and city smart services. Their partnership ecosystem includes notable clients like Unizone and Noc vědců. Growth indicators include a portfolio of ongoing projects and active social media presence. Revenue streams are likely project-based contracts. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and expanding incident response capabilities to strengthen trust and market position.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The company should improve security posture by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response contacts. These steps will reduce risk and enhance customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve defense against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide explicit incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing data retention policies and user privacy notices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
beecode, s.r.o.
Registration number
C 90894/KSOS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
beecode, s.r.o.
Description
Jsme tým vývojářů s několikaletými zkušenostmi v oblasti mobilního a webového vývoje. Pomůžeme vám převést myšlenky do digitálního světa a navrhneme komplexní produkt, který vašim uživatelům usnadní každodenní život. Je nám blízký moderní design, kreativnější přístup a technologické výzvy, ale rádi přijdeme s řešením i pro konzervativnější klienty.
Key services
Native Android app development (Kotlin), Native iOS app development (Swift), Backend development with Node.js and TypeScript, Frontend development with Vue.js, Microservice architecture based backend IS/beecode, Custom information systems and web applications
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Kotlin, Swift, Node.js, TypeScript, Vue.js, Docker, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Elasticsearch
Frameworks
Vue.js, Bootstrap
Platforms
Android, iOS, Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy-protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company emails, phone, and physical address.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and frameworks with good mobile optimization.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present.
  7. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Kotlin and Swift for native mobile apps, Node.js and TypeScript for backend APIs, and Vue.js for frontend interactivity. Docker containers and microservice architecture underpin their backend infrastructure, supporting scalability and maintainability. The site uses Bootstrap for responsive design and Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is excellent, with clear navigation and consistent branding. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom-built solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of explicit privacy mechanisms, which should be addressed to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beecode.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beecode.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.