Skip to main content

Security report for bebold.lv

BeBold · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BeBold is a Latvian digital agency specializing in creating modern and engaging visual materials for businesses. The website presents a professional image with clear contact information and a focus on serving local enterprises. The company leverages Webflow as its platform, integrating common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel to monitor and optimize user engagement. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but does not implement advanced security headers or provide a vulnerability disclosure policy. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the website is credible and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bebold.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BeBold operates as a small-sized digital agency in Latvia, targeting businesses seeking digital marketing and visual content creation services. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering customized digital solutions. The website content and branding are consistent, supporting a trustworthy market position within the local digital agency sector. The company uses modern web technologies and integrates standard marketing and analytics tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The absence of detailed corporate information such as founding year or parent company suggests a standalone entity. The contact details and social media presence support customer engagement and business credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, which limits transparency and incident response readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small digital agency but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify user rights and obligations.
  3. Configure and deploy security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and ensure GDPR compliance in data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BeBold
Description
Mēs esam Digitālā aģentūra! Palīdzam uzņēmumiem radīt mūsdienīgus un saistošus vizuālos materiālus, kas neatstās vienaldzīgu.
Key services
digital agency services, visual materials creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Lottie animations, Finsweet Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital agency based in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local businesses.
  3. Contact info includes company email and phone number with clear context.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Finsweet script.
  6. Uses modern Webflow platform and common analytics/tracking tools.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web fonts, SVG animations via Lottie, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads CSS and scripts from reputable CDNs, ensuring reliable delivery. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and viewport settings. Accessibility features are basic but could be enhanced. SEO is supported by meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards, but structured data like JSON-LD was not detected. Performance is moderate, typical for Webflow-hosted sites. The absence of visible security headers and limited privacy documentation represent technical debt and compliance risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small digital agency but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bebold.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bebold.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.