Skip to main content

Security report for be.live

Be.Live · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Be.Live is a technology company offering a SaaS live streaming platform designed for ease of use, enabling users to stream simultaneously to multiple platforms with custom branding and engagement tools. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and targets live streamers and businesses seeking branded streaming solutions. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, AWS hosting, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, and Tapfiliate. However, the website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical security vulnerability. No security headers or advanced security policies are implemented, and contact information is not explicitly provided on the site. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are basic, with limited GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate business credibility and technical maturity but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching be.live

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
45
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Be.Live operates in the competitive live streaming SaaS market, focusing on ease of use and multi-platform streaming capabilities. Its business model is subscription-based with multiple plans, including free trials and AppSumo tiers. The company leverages partnerships with NVIDIA and Facebook Live, enhancing market credibility. Marketing efforts include affiliate programs and extensive user tracking. The absence of explicit contact details and limited security disclosures may impact trust among enterprise customers. Growth indicators include active marketing automation and user engagement tools. The company maintains a consistent brand presence across social media channels and offers a comprehensive set of streaming features targeting content creators and businesses.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No HTTP security headers are present, and TLS protocols are disabled, indicating poor encryption practices. The site uses secure authentication forms with client-side validation but lacks published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found, limiting transparency. The integration of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface, necessitating regular security audits. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and implementation of security headers are critical to improving the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  4. Publish clear security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure information.
  5. Add explicit company contact information to enhance trust and compliance.
  6. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments of third-party integrations.
  7. Improve privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention.
  8. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on AWS infrastructure, utilizing Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. It integrates multiple modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Tapfiliate, and HelpCrunch chat. Performance is suboptimal with a high page load time (~24 seconds) and large page size (~1MB). The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the lack of HTTPS and security headers poses significant risks. The authentication system includes client-side validation but the sign-up function is disabled with a placeholder alert. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires security hardening and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with be.live. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review be.live.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.