Skip to main content

Security report for bctg.lv

Core Deep Solutions · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bctg.lv is a login portal branded as 'FRIGATE by Core Deep Solutions'. It appears to serve as an access point for users of a software product or service named FRIGATE. The public-facing content is minimal, with no descriptive business information, contact details, or policies visible. The technical infrastructure relies on older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.9.1 and Bootstrap, indicating moderate digital maturity but some technical debt. The site is mobile responsive and uses HTTPS, but lacks visible security headers and advanced security controls such as multi-factor authentication or CAPTCHA. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site presents a basic, functional interface with limited transparency or trust signals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bctg.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Core Deep Solutions appears to be a technology company offering the FRIGATE product, likely targeting enterprise or business users requiring secure login access. The absence of public business information, contact details, or marketing content suggests a closed user base or internal tool. The business model is not explicit but likely software-as-a-service or enterprise software. No partnerships, certifications, or market positioning details are available. The lack of privacy and cookie policies and minimal content reduces business credibility and user trust.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The site uses HTTPS and a POST login form with password input, but lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no visible CSRF protection or bot mitigation on the login form. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may expose vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trust. Recommendations include implementing security headers, CSRF tokens, multi-factor authentication, and CAPTCHA to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add CSRF protection tokens and bot mitigation (e.g., CAPTCHA) on login forms.
  3. Upgrade JavaScript libraries to supported, secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Publish privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Core Deep Solutions
Description
The website appears to be related to a product or service named FRIGATE offered by Core Deep Solutions. No further business description or services are explicitly detailed on the login page.
Key services
FRIGATE product/service
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery UI, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Ionicons, jQuery Gritter, Flot charts, jQuery Sparkline, jQuery jVectorMap, Bootstrap Datepicker, jQuery Tag-it, DataTables
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • Login form uses POST method
  • Password input field present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal with minimal public content
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact information or business addresses provided
  4. No social media or external business links present
  5. Technical stack is somewhat outdated (jQuery 1.9.1)
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security controls
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected
  9. Site uses HTTPS but no SSL details provided
  10. No structured data or Open Graph metadata present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery 1.9.1, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and various jQuery plugins for UI and charts. The site is mobile responsive and loads moderate resources. However, the use of outdated libraries and lack of modern frameworks or CMS indicates technical debt and potential security risks. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization or SEO metadata. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA or semantic enhancements detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bctg.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bctg.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.