Skip to main content

Security report for baycloud.com

Baycloud Systems Ltd. · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baycloud Systems Ltd. operates a mature and established consent management platform focused on privacy compliance with GDPR, CCPA, and ePrivacy laws. The company provides a cookieless and tracking-free analytics solution integrated with consent management, targeting businesses that require robust privacy compliance tools. The platform is trusted by multinational and household brands and has been operational since 2011, supported by a domain registered since 2009. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Blazor Server and Telerik UI, with a clean and professional design optimized for desktop and mobile users. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and Content-Security-Policy headers, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some additional security headers could improve defenses. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. However, no explicit terms of service or incident response policies are published. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional business with a strong focus on privacy and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baycloud.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baycloud Systems is positioned as a niche B2B SaaS provider specializing in consent management and privacy compliance solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in early market entry and a focus on authentic, transparent consent combined with cookieless analytics. The business model revolves around subscription-based services for companies needing to comply with evolving privacy regulations. The target customers are enterprises and SMEs managing multiple websites requiring compliance oversight. The company demonstrates growth potential through its scalable dashboard and integration capabilities with business communication platforms. The absence of public contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled lead generation approach via contact forms. The company maintains a consistent brand and messaging focused on trust and compliance, supported by testimonials from recognized organizations.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate common web attacks. The domain status flags indicate good domain management practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an opportunity for improvement. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which could enhance transparency and trust. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program limits external security engagement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Add explicit contact emails or phone numbers for sales and support to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baycloud Systems Ltd.
Description
Provides privacy preserving analytics and consent management platform designed for GDPR, ePrivacy, CCPA and other privacy law compliance with cookieless and tracking-free analytics.
Key services
Consent management platform, Cookieless & tracking-free analytics, Automated cookie scanning, Compliance dashboard
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Blazor, Telerik UI for Blazor, Bootstrap, D3.js, Stripe.js
Frameworks
Blazor Server
Platforms
Microsoft Azure (likely, based on Blazor usage)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • Client-side script integrity via trusted CDNs
  • Consent management for cookie compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baycloud proprietary cookieless analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B SaaS platform focused on privacy compliance and consent management.
  2. Content is well structured with clear calls to action and detailed feature descriptions.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms/buttons.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Strong emphasis on GDPR, CCPA, and ePrivacy compliance.
  6. No evidence of third-party ad networks or tracking pixels.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. No security.txt or incident response info published.
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Blazor Server and Telerik UI components, indicating a well-maintained and scalable infrastructure. Use of Bootstrap and D3.js enhances UI responsiveness and data visualization capabilities. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses CDN-hosted resources for performance optimization. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and has a long history, supporting business legitimacy. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of a traditional CMS, suggesting a custom-built platform. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for enhancements in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baycloud.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baycloud.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.