Skip to main content

Security report for batchgeo.com

BatchGeo LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BatchGeo LLC operates a specialized web-based mapping service that enables users to quickly create interactive maps from location data such as addresses, postcodes, or coordinates. Established in 2010 and headquartered in Seattle, USA, BatchGeo targets individuals and businesses seeking fast and easy geospatial visualization without complex GIS tools. The company offers a freemium SaaS model with a free tier and a Pro subscription for advanced features, positioning itself as a user-friendly and efficient mapping solution in the technology sector. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, Sentry for error monitoring, and Google Maps APIs. The infrastructure is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and likely CDN, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with comprehensive metadata and structured data enhancing search visibility. From a security perspective, BatchGeo enforces HTTPS, uses EPP domain locks, and integrates error monitoring with filtering to reduce noise. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, representing areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR considerations. Overall, BatchGeo presents a low-risk profile with a mature domain, consistent business information, and professional web presence. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching batchgeo.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BatchGeo holds a niche position in the mapping and geospatial visualization market, focusing on ease of use and speed. Its freemium business model allows broad adoption with monetization through Pro subscriptions. The company leverages partnerships with major analytics and advertising platforms to optimize marketing and user engagement. The presence of structured data and clear contact information supports transparency and customer trust. Growth potential lies in expanding advanced features and enterprise offerings. The company maintains a lean operation with a small team, emphasizing technology and customer experience.

Security posture

BatchGeo demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforcement, domain registration protections, and active error monitoring via Sentry. The site avoids exposing sensitive data and implements form validation including reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of DNSSEC and public vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and defense in depth. No incident response contacts are publicly listed, which could delay response to security events. Overall, the security maturity is good for a small technology company but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Audit and explicitly implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website for security issues.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BatchGeo LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BatchGeo LLC
Description
BatchGeo is a map creation tool that allows users to easily create maps from location data by pasting addresses, postcodes, or coordinates. It offers free hosting for interactive map locators and a Pro version with advanced features.
Key services
Map creation from spreadsheet or pasted data, Geocoding addresses, Interactive map hosting, Multi-point routing, Map sharing and embedding
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, Sentry (error monitoring), Google Charts, Google Maps API, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Sentry BrowserTracing
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring with filtering
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form inputs with validation and reCAPTCHA
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a clear and professional mapping service with a strong focus on user experience.
  2. Use of multiple analytics and advertising tools indicates active marketing and user behavior tracking.
  3. Security posture is good but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and publishing vulnerability disclosure info.
  4. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
  5. Privacy and terms policies are clearly linked and comprehensive.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom platform using modern JavaScript frameworks (likely React) with Redux state management. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, advertising, and error monitoring, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Hosting via Cloudflare provides CDN and DNS resilience. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and mobile responsiveness. The site uses Google Maps APIs extensively for mapping features. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and enhancing security headers would reduce risk. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and comprehensive metadata supporting SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with batchgeo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review batchgeo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.