Skip to main content

Security report for basecom.co

Basecom · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Basecom is a specialized B2B SaaS website design agency focused on creating conversion rate optimized websites that help SaaS companies double their revenue. Their market position is that of a niche agency delivering CRO-driven, visually stunning, and SEO-friendly websites. The company leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow, Lottie animations, and integrates analytics tools like Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager to provide a high-quality digital experience. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and professional, reflecting a mature digital presence for a small agency. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some security headers and formal privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for small agencies, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and explicit contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching basecom.co

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Basecom operates as a service provider in the technology sector, targeting B2B SaaS companies seeking website design and development services. Their business model centers on delivering conversion-first websites that act as growth engines for SaaS businesses. The agency showcases client logos and performance metrics as trust signals, indicating a focus on measurable results. Revenue streams likely come from project-based website design and development contracts. The company uses scheduling tools like Cal.com for client engagement, indicating a streamlined sales process. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and compliance. The agency's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection represents a compliance gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism such as a security.txt file. Data protection practices and GDPR compliance indicators are missing, which could pose regulatory risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible on the site. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers clearly labeled for sales and support to improve business credibility.
  4. Establish and disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Basecom
Description
We design and develop conversion-first B2B SaaS websites that turn your visitors into customers.
Key services
Conversion-first website design, Visually stunning design, Pixel perfect development, SEO friendly website development, Fast and scalable websites
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Lottie animations, JavaScript
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Cal.com scheduling
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Strong focus on CRO and SaaS website design services.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. WHOIS data is redacted, limiting domain ownership insights.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including JavaScript and Lottie animations for interactive graphics. It integrates analytics and tracking tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, enabling moderate user behavior tracking. The site is hosted on Webflow's infrastructure, which provides fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility standards. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for a small agency focused on SaaS clients.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with basecom.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review basecom.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.