Skip to main content

Security report for baqend.com

Speed Kit · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Speed Kit is a technology company specializing in website acceleration software primarily targeting ecommerce brands. Their flagship product accelerates dynamic and personalized website content to improve user experience, SEO rankings, and conversion rates. The company positions itself as a market leader with a comprehensive suite of features including dynamic caching, browser caching, image optimization, and predictive preloading. The website is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as service workers, Cloudflare hosting, and Webflow CMS, combined with analytics tools like Plausible and HubSpot forms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and several security headers present, though improvements are recommended in HSTS configuration and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is generally good with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR adherence, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high credibility and trustworthiness with no blocking or WAF interference detected.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of baqend.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baqend.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Speed Kit operates in the technology and ecommerce sectors, offering SaaS solutions for website performance optimization. Their business model focuses on accelerating dynamic ecommerce websites, a niche underserved by traditional CDNs. The company has a strong market position supported by notable customers and partnerships. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their acceleration software and consulting services such as free speed checks. The target audience includes ecommerce brands and digital teams seeking to improve site speed and conversion. The company maintains a partner ecosystem and provides extensive resources including documentation, blogs, and ROI calculators. Growth indicators include a large customer base (10,000+ websites) and global deployments (e.g., BMW in 118 countries).

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers such as Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options. However, HSTS is not fully enabled with includeSubDomains or preload flags, and OCSP stapling is missing, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. GDPR compliance is affirmed with anonymization of IP addresses and use of GDPR-compliant subcontractors. The site uses tracking and analytics tools with moderate user tracking levels but lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, enabling full HSTS, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Cloudflare, leveraging modern web technologies including service workers for dynamic caching and acceleration. The tech stack includes JavaScript, Plausible Analytics, HubSpot forms, and SalesViewer for marketing analytics. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines and font smoothing are implemented. The site uses advanced caching strategies and predictive preloading to enhance user experience. Technical debt appears low with modern best practices applied, though some security header enhancements and privacy compliance improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low28 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baqend.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baqend.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.