Skip to main content

Security report for baqend.com

Speed Kit · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Speed Kit is a technology company specializing in website acceleration software primarily targeting ecommerce brands. Their solution focuses on improving website speed through advanced caching techniques, image optimization, and predictive preloading, which in turn boosts SEO, marketing efficiency, and revenue conversion. The company positions itself as a market leader with a strong portfolio of notable customers such as BMW and Decathlon, and a broad adoption across 10,000+ websites. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, service workers, and integrates analytics tools like Plausible and Cloudflare Insights. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and employs advanced caching strategies that enhance performance without exposing sensitive data. GDPR compliance is explicitly stated, with data processing agreements and use of GDPR-compliant subcontractors. However, the absence of a visible incident response policy or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and technically mature, but the missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, publishing incident response information, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of baqend.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baqend.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Speed Kit operates in the competitive website acceleration market, focusing on ecommerce brands that require dynamic content acceleration beyond traditional CDNs. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering a plug-and-play solution that integrates easily with existing infrastructures. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers like AWS and Fastly and maintains a partner ecosystem including research collaborations and a partner program. Their growth is supported by strong customer testimonials and a broad client base. The company emphasizes measurable ROI through speed improvements, targeting marketing teams, developers, and ecommerce decision-makers. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in technical innovation and expanding partner networks will be key to maintaining market leadership.

Security posture

Speed Kit demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforcement, GDPR compliance, and use of privacy-conscious subcontractors. The browser-based acceleration approach minimizes backend changes and reduces attack surface. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and absence of a public vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy are gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. The company should enhance transparency by publishing security policies and establishing formal incident response contacts. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved to meet enterprise standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Speed Kit
Description
Speed Kit accelerates your website to turn slow visitors into fast customers. Boost your SEO. Turbocharge your Google ads. Convert more sales.
Key services
Dynamic caching, Consistent browser caching, Image optimization, Third-party acceleration, Predictive preloading, Speed analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Service Workers, SVG, Webflow CMS, Cloudflare Insights, Baqend
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
AWS (implied via subcontractors), Fastly (implied via subcontractors)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of service workers for caching
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • GDPR compliance stated

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
SalesViewer
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  3. Strong focus on website acceleration technology for ecommerce.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR compliance claim.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Multiple customer testimonials and logos enhance trust.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS with a modern JavaScript stack including service workers for caching and performance optimization. It integrates third-party analytics (Plausible, Cloudflare Insights) and marketing tools (HubSpot). Hosting appears to leverage Baqend and Cloudflare infrastructure, ensuring fast global delivery. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. Performance is enhanced by advanced caching strategies and image optimization. Technical debt is low, but improvements in security headers and cookie management are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical risk for domain management and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100 +14Low28 findingsView report
  2. 62/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baqend.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baqend.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.