Skip to main content

Security report for baltaisfligelis.lv

Siguldas Mākslu skola “Baltais Flīģelis” · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents Siguldas Mākslu skola “Baltais Flīģelis”, a small local arts school and associated concert hall in Sigulda, Latvia. The site is currently under maintenance but provides essential links to social media and local government pages for updates. The business focuses on arts education and cultural event hosting, targeting local students, parents, and arts enthusiasts. The digital presence is minimal but consistent with a small educational institution. Technically, the website uses basic HTML5 and CSS3 with Font Awesome icons. It is mobile responsive and has a clean, simple design. However, there is no evidence of advanced CMS, analytics, or security features. The lack of privacy, cookie policies, and contact information limits compliance and user trust. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing privacy risks but also limiting engagement. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and HTTPS status is unknown from the data provided. No vulnerabilities or tracking scripts were detected. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but no suspicious content or indicators were found on the site itself. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved with standard best practices. The overall risk is low given the nature of the site and its limited functionality, but improvements in transparency, security, and compliance are recommended to enhance trust and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltaisfligelis.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Siguldas Mākslu skola “Baltais Flīģelis” operates as a local educational and cultural institution in Latvia, focusing on arts education and concert events. Its market position is regional with a community-oriented approach. The business model is service-based, providing education and cultural programming. Revenue likely derives from tuition, event hosting, and possibly municipal support. The target customers are local students, parents, and cultural audiences. The website links to official social media and local government portals, indicating partnerships and community integration. Growth indicators are not visible from the site. The lack of detailed business information online suggests a small-scale operation with limited digital marketing focus.

Security posture

The current security maturity is basic. The website lacks visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user interaction. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and clear contact channels for security incidents to improve its security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and ensure all site content is served securely.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and incident response contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Siguldas Mākslu skola “Baltais Flīģelis”
Description
Siguldas Mākslu skola “Baltais Flīģelis” is an arts school located in Sigulda, Latvia, offering arts education and related cultural activities. The site also references Siguldas koncertzāle “Baltais Flīģelis”, a concert hall associated with the same brand.
Key services
Arts education, Concert and cultural event hosting, Student admissions
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Font Awesome 6.0.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently under maintenance with a clear notice.
  2. Content is minimal but informative with links to official social media and local government pages.
  3. No forms or data collection elements present on the page.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page.
  6. No security headers or advanced security features detected in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Site uses Font Awesome for icons and basic CSS styling.
  9. Mobile responsive design is implemented via CSS media queries.
  10. No CMS or backend technology detectable from provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with simple HTML and CSS, using Font Awesome for icons. It is mobile responsive with basic accessibility considerations. No CMS or backend technology is detectable from the provided HTML. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and external CSS usage. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating low data collection. The site lacks advanced SEO features and metadata beyond basic title and viewport tags. There is an opportunity to modernize the site with a CMS, improve SEO, and enhance accessibility and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltaisfligelis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltaisfligelis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.