Skip to main content

Security report for bablic.com

Bablic Ltd · Technology · Israel

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bablic Ltd operates a professional website offering a SaaS platform for website translation and localization, targeting businesses seeking to expand globally with multilingual websites. The company emphasizes ease of use, SEO benefits, and integration with popular platforms. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and includes client logos and testimonials to build trust. Technically, the site uses modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, and Hotjar, alongside Google reCAPTCHA for form security. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and branding mitigate some risk. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and CAPTCHA usage, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency on domain registration and security practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bablic.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bablic.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bablic is positioned as a cost-effective and user-friendly website translation management tool, serving a global market of businesses aiming to localize their websites quickly. The business model is SaaS-based, generating revenue likely through subscription plans. The presence of major client logos and social media channels indicates a credible market presence. The company targets small to medium businesses and agencies needing multilingual website solutions. The integration ecosystem includes popular CMS and e-commerce platforms, enhancing market reach. The lack of WHOIS data suggests either privacy protection or a recent domain registration, which should be monitored. Marketing efforts leverage multiple analytics and retargeting tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. Tracking and analytics scripts are used extensively, which may raise privacy considerations but appear compliant with GDPR as privacy and cookie policies are present. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected in the HTML source, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and domain transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy including incident response contacts.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Verify and disclose domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bablic Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bablic Ltd
Description
Bablic is the quickest and easiest localization solution to translate your website within minutes
Key services
Website translation, Localization, Visual editor for translation management, Integration with multiple platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Mixpanel, jQuery, Bablic localization snippet
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Strong focus on website translation and localization services
  3. Multiple client logos and testimonials enhance trust
  4. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy concerns
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and accessible
  8. No direct company contact emails found in HTML; phone and address present
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, Hotjar, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. The HTML and CSS appear valid and well-structured. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics and marketing, which increases tracking but also complexity. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bablic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bablic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.