Skip to main content

Security report for b2gnow.com

B2Gnow · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

B2Gnow is a technology company specializing in supplier diversity, vendor management, labor compliance, and grant management software solutions. Their platform targets government agencies and enterprises seeking to streamline compliance and diversity initiatives. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on compliance software services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and integrates modern analytics and cookie consent tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed privacy policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could enhance compliance transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching b2gnow.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
90
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

B2Gnow positions itself as an industry leader in compliance and supplier diversity software, serving government and enterprise sectors. The business model is SaaS-based, focusing on compliance management solutions. The website's SEO and marketing integrations suggest active digital marketing efforts. However, absence of detailed contact information and legal policies may limit user trust and engagement. The company appears to maintain a moderate market presence with potential for growth through enhanced transparency and security compliance. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a cookie consent mechanism via iubenda, reflecting awareness of privacy compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement additional headers and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Include clear contact information for business and security inquiries to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
B2Gnow
Description
Streamline your projects with industry-leading software that manages compliance in your supplier diversity, labor compliance, and grant management initiatives.
Key services
Supplier Diversity Software, Vendor Management, Labor Compliance, Grant Management Software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap 5.1.3, Google Tag Manager, iubenda Cookie Solution, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), StackAdapt
Marketing tools
iubenda Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern Bootstrap framework.
  2. Cookie consent implemented via iubenda.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage HTML.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  6. Website content is business-focused and professional.
  7. External scripts include Google Tag Manager and StackAdapt for analytics and advertising.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are well implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 5.1.3 framework and uses jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates Google Tag Manager and StackAdapt for analytics and advertising purposes. Fonts are loaded from fonts.wp.com, and cookie compliance is managed via iubenda scripts. The site shows good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social media sharing. Performance is moderate with preloading of key assets. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. No hosting provider details were explicitly detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with b2gnow.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review b2gnow.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.