Skip to main content

Security report for b1.lt

Site.pro · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Site.pro is a Finnish technology company specializing in AI-powered website building solutions. Their platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including AI website creation, domain registration, email services, online stores, and collaboration tools. The company targets a broad audience ranging from individuals and small businesses to resellers and design studios, positioning itself as an accessible and versatile SaaS provider in the website building market. The website is professionally designed, supports multiple languages, and integrates modern web technologies to enhance user experience and functionality. Technically, Site.pro employs a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Bootstrap Material Design, and supports advanced login mechanisms such as social OAuth and WebAuthn biometric authentication, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses captchas on forms, and provides secure login options, though explicit security headers could be more visible and a dedicated security policy page is absent. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture with room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for SaaS companies, and no suspicious patterns were detected. The site is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, supporting a positive risk profile. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing vulnerability disclosure policies, and improving accessibility compliance to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 14 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching b1.lt

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
77
DNS health
90
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
58
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Site.pro operates in the competitive website builder SaaS market with a focus on AI-driven automation and ease of use. Their business model includes freemium and paid plans, reseller and white-label programs, and integration with domain and email services, creating multiple revenue streams. The platform's multi-language support and collaboration features cater to diverse customer segments including individuals, SMBs, and agencies. The company leverages partnerships with major technology providers for analytics and advertising, enhancing marketing reach and data insights. The presence of affiliate programs and reseller panels indicates a strategic approach to market expansion. While the company appears medium-sized and established in Finland, no parent or subsidiary relationships were identified. The website content and structure reflect a consistent brand identity and professional market positioning.

Security posture

Site.pro exhibits a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS, captcha protections on forms, and support for secure login methods including OAuth and WebAuthn biometric authentication. The site uses Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts responsibly, with no exposed sensitive data detected in the HTML. However, explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-XSS-Protection are not clearly present in the HTML source, which could be improved. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests an opportunity to enhance security culture and communication. Overall, the site is secure for users but could benefit from improved security documentation and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly publish security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Create and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Site.pro
Description
Site.pro offers an AI-powered website builder platform that enables users to create websites easily and quickly. It provides over 200 templates, supports online stores, collaboration features, plugins, and multi-language support. The platform targets individuals, businesses, resellers, and design studios.
Key services
AI website builder, Domain registration, Email services, Online stores, Collaboration tools, Plugins and extensions, Reseller and white-label programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, Bootstrap Material Design, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, AJAX, Wizard JS module, Captcha integration
Frameworks
Bootstrap Material Design
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Captcha on forms
  • Social login options with OAuth providers
  • WebAuthn biometric login support
  • Input validation on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics, Yandex Metrica
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics, Yandex Metrica
Marketing tools
TradeDoubler
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Finnish with multi-language support links.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  4. Multiple social login options and biometric login support enhance security and usability.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked in terms of service.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. WHOIS data is limited due to TLD not supported and privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap Material Design, jQuery, and Google services for analytics and tag management. It supports advanced login mechanisms such as social OAuth and WebAuthn biometric authentication, indicating a forward-looking approach to user security and convenience. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses multiple CSS and JS assets for UI and UX enhancements. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics and ads scripts. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter Cards. The site could improve by consolidating CSS/JS assets to reduce load times and enhancing accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the HTML source.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with b1.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review b1.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.