Skip to main content

Security report for axxim.net

Luke Strickland · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website axxim.net is a personal portfolio site for Luke Strickland, a technologist and craftsman engaged in building a classic vehicle marketplace (CLASSIC.COM) and restoring buildings through LSR Properties LLC. The site serves primarily as a professional showcase with links to projects and a resume, targeting a general audience interested in technology and real estate restoration. The business model is individual-driven with a focus on niche markets such as classic vehicles and property restoration. Technically, the site is simple and lightweight, built with standard HTML and CSS, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. It demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and fast performance but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS. SEO and accessibility are basic but adequate for a personal portfolio. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the domain is well-established since 2009 with stable registration and domain status protections. However, the website lacks security headers, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which limits compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, reducing transparency. Overall, the site is low risk with good business credibility but could improve security posture and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching axxim.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Luke Strickland operates as an individual technologist with a small business footprint focused on technology and real estate sectors. The website highlights key projects such as CLASSIC.COM, a marketplace for classic vehicles, and LSR Properties LLC for building restoration. The business model is project and service-oriented, targeting enthusiasts and clients in niche markets. The site lacks commercial e-commerce features but serves as a professional portfolio and contact point. The presence of multiple project links suggests a diverse portfolio and potential partnerships. The domain age and registration details support a stable and credible business presence. Growth indicators include active project development and property restoration ventures. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified.

Security posture

The security posture of axxim.net is moderate. The domain registration is stable with clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses, reducing risk of hijacking. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. The website lacks HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could mitigate common web attacks. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site is low complexity and low risk but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Consider adding incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Luke Strickland
Description
Personal website of Luke Strickland, a technologist building CLASSIC.COM (a marketplace for classic vehicles) and restoring buildings through LSR Properties LLC.
Key services
Classic vehicle marketplace development, Building restoration via LSR Properties LLC
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by Cloudflare DNS and domain status)
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio for Luke Strickland showcasing technology projects and real estate restoration.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a single company email address.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. Simple, clean design with good mobile responsiveness.
  7. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. Domain registered with Porkbun LLC since 2009, expiring in 2026.
  9. Uses Cloudflare DNS but no Cloudflare WAF detected on content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without use of advanced frameworks or CMS, resulting in fast load times and good mobile responsiveness. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS, but no Cloudflare WAF or other security services are detected on the content delivery path. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags present. Accessibility features are minimal but the site is readable and navigable on mobile devices. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The technical stack is simple and low maintenance but could be enhanced with modern SEO and security best practices to improve visibility and protection.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with axxim.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review axxim.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.