Skip to main content

Security report for axtrics.com

Axtrics · Technology · India

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Axtrics is a medium-sized consulting and technology services company specializing in healthcare, eCommerce, and staffing solutions. The company operates globally with a workforce of over 200 professionals and serves clients in 10 countries. Their website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and contact information, targeting business clients seeking technology and consulting expertise. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various marketing and analytics tools. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching axtrics.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Axtrics positions itself as a world leader in consulting and technology services with a focus on healthcare innovation, eCommerce solutions, and staffing services. The business model revolves around providing specialized consulting and technology services to enterprises across multiple countries. The presence of dedicated subdomains and partner sites indicates a diversified service offering and regional partnerships. The company targets medium to large enterprises in healthcare and retail sectors. The website content and structure support a credible business presence, though lack of detailed company registration data and certifications limits full trust. Marketing and analytics tools suggest an active approach to customer engagement and lead generation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam and abuse. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and GDPR compliance indicators is a compliance gap for European visitors. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting external security collaboration. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Axtrics
Description
Axtrics is a world leader in consulting and technology services. With a workforce of 200+ intellectuals on-board, we are helping companies realize their goals in 10 countries across the globe
Key services
Healthcare Services, End to End eCommerce Services, Staffing Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, Yoast SEO, FullPage.js, Owl Carousel, Animsition, Typed.js, Isotope
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Scripts
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered in public VeriSign database
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and linked in navigation
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected
  7. Security headers are not detected in provided data; HTTPS is enforced
  8. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented on forms
  9. Multiple external tracking and marketing scripts are used
  10. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a variety of modern JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery, Bootstrap, FullPage.js, Owl Carousel, and Typed.js. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and marketing analytics, alongside HubSpot scripts. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with no critical issues detected. However, the site lacks some accessibility features and security headers. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from improved security configurations and privacy compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with axtrics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review axtrics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.